It used to be so simple. Public relations was all about getting the news media to take notice of what our companies were doing; so we delivered press kits, arranged interviews, and doled out exclusives in effort to get our messages heard.
Then along came the Internet. And web design. And Google, Facebook and Twitter. And blogging, analytics and metadata. As soon as we get our heads around one idea, another one comes along. And doesn’t it seem like the boss wants to try them all — right now?
The boss is right about one thing: Today’s increasingly borderless and transparent information environment demands that customers and potential customers have full, whenever/wherever access to compelling content about our companies and their offerings. Still, though, sometimes there’s a new-product launch, a new CEO, or a funding announcement that really calls out for some traditional, For Immediate Release PR.
New Tasks for New Times
So how do companies choose the right message, the right vehicle and the right timing, especially as options expand and budgets contract? The same way they make a lot of decisions: They look for experts, and choose them carefully.
These days the most reliable experts in public relations have embraced the principles of content marketing without forgetting that more traditional public relations strategies can still be very effective. Furthermore, they understand how each approach can augment the other.
The highest performers can crank up two engines for ideas. One is centered around outreach, and produces results through both traditional media relations and newer vehicles like social media and link building. The other engine is content-focused, and produces blogs, articles and other online elements as well as press releases and collateral. These two approaches don’t compete; they complement.
A PR Campaign for PR
All this change has gotten a whole industry thinking, and currently the Public Relations Society of America is the process – literally – of redefining PR. Soon there will be a summit meeting and a vote on the group’s official definition of public relations.
We hope that as our industry branches out in new directions that it embraces the new methods without jettisoning some older ones. They both work. Together they work even better.

advertising. U.S. newspaper advertising sales struggled to reach $24 billion in 2011, less than half the total from 2005. Clearly, businesses are finding other ways to convey their marketing messages. One convert is a very familiar name.
That’s what happened recently on 
Joe Pulizzi of the Content Marketing Institute just came to town to remind us that content marketing is not only here to stay, it’s been here for a long time.
As members of the Social Media Club of Dallas tweeted busily, Pulizzi introduced them to The Furrow, the quarterly journal of agriculture published in 12 languages and distributed in 40 countries by Deere & Company. It debuted in 1895.
“Brands have been publishers for a long, long time,” he said, before introducing a free 1905 recipe book featuring recipes for Jell-O. “We can do a lot of what media companies can do, and sometimes we can do it better.”
The key difference between the media and the marketers, he said, has been their monetizing method. While media companies look for advertising, marketers seek new customers. “Everything else is the same,” he said.
Brands are ‘Owning the Media’
Pulizzi showed examples of several engaging online magazines: Home Made Simple, Being Girl, and Man of the House, all vehicles for Procter & Gamble. Pulizzi termed such ventures “owning the media, not renting the media,” and went as far as to say he expects the shift in content creation from media to marketers to pick up even more momentum.
“Most of the M&A you’ll see in the next several years will be brands buying media companies, because the brands have money and the media companies don’t.”
Content 2020 Shows the Way
As further evidence of the transformation, he cited The Coca-Cola Company’s Content 2020 plan, the subject of a recent Media Orchard post. When he asked how many in the audience had heard of it, we were surprised at how few hands went up.
Most of them belonged to people here at Idea Grove.