"Insider Rating," Public Policy Debate and the Power of Words

Turns of phrase can be meaningful in public policy discussions. In fact, they can make all the difference in public sentiment on an issue.
So, instead of "pro-abortion rights" and "anti-abortion rights," we have "pro-life" and "pro-choice."
And instead of "estate tax," opponents began using the term "death tax." Why? Because most people don't have multi-million-dollar estates -- but all of us will die.
In this election season, the phrase that has kept ringing in my ear is from a Barack Obama speech: "We are the change we've been waiting for." What a powerful message for voters in what has been described as a "change" election.
Such turns of phrase are designed to persuade, but they also can help people to understand public policy issues better. For example, Scott Burns [pictured] -- the wonderful personal finance writer and co-founder of the Web startup AssetBuilder -- has coined a beauty.
In his syndicated column this Sunday, he and co-author Laurence Kotlikoff offer a term to describe the conflict of interest inherent in the work of credit rating agencies like Moody's and Standard & Poor's.
The term: Insider rating.
What's beautiful about it is that it takes a rating system that is arcane to most people and makes a case for what's wrong with it in two words that even casual investors can understand -- because they immediately relate it to "insider trading." When you hear the term "insider rating," it immediately sounds like a problem that needs to be fixed.
Which is exactly what Burns and Kotlikoff argue. In fact, they believe a new federal agency may be necessary to ensure securities ratings are fairly administered.
You can read the full column here.
As you might expect, the column has stirred debate. A pundit at Housing Wire has bashed the plan, while the readers at Daily Kos are supportive of the idea.
But stirring debate -- sharing words -- is how change begins.
[Full disclosure: AssetBuilder is an Idea Grove client.]
Labels: AssetBuilder, credit rating agencies, insider rating, Moody's, Standard and Poor's


















0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home