<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is It Time to Return to Snail Mail?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2008/01/is-it-time-to-return-to-snail-mail.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2008/01/is-it-time-to-return-to-snail-mail.html</link>
	<description>Bringing You Media News, Marketing Views, Celebrity Culture &#38; Political Spin Since February 2005</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 16:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scott Baradell</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2008/01/is-it-time-to-return-to-snail-mail.html/comment-page-1#comment-3580</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Baradell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 23:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=2200#comment-3580</guid>
		<description>I believe Kevin was originally a suspect in the Unabomber case, so any swag he sents out might have a bit of a kick to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe Kevin was originally a suspect in the Unabomber case, so any swag he sents out might have a bit of a kick to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kami Huyse</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2008/01/is-it-time-to-return-to-snail-mail.html/comment-page-1#comment-3579</link>
		<dc:creator>Kami Huyse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 22:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=2200#comment-3579</guid>
		<description>Hey; I would love to get a FedEx.  Anyone want to send me one?  As for pitches, certainly if it is worth it.  But just a bunch of SWAG won't get you coverage - though it does earn my undying gratitude (thanks Kevin).&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Then again, maybe that is just because I am a flak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey; I would love to get a FedEx.  Anyone want to send me one?  As for pitches, certainly if it is worth it.  But just a bunch of SWAG won&#8217;t get you coverage - though it does earn my undying gratitude (thanks Kevin).</p>
<p>Then again, maybe that is just because I am a flak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff_Livingston</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2008/01/is-it-time-to-return-to-snail-mail.html/comment-page-1#comment-3575</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff_Livingston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 23:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=2200#comment-3575</guid>
		<description>I do like to use this with the media, particularly important pitches. In fact, if it really matters I use FedEx.  A reporter or even a marketing VP will always open a FedEx.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do like to use this with the media, particularly important pitches. In fact, if it really matters I use FedEx.  A reporter or even a marketing VP will always open a FedEx.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Baradell</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2008/01/is-it-time-to-return-to-snail-mail.html/comment-page-1#comment-3574</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Baradell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 19:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=2200#comment-3574</guid>
		<description>That's for sure.  Upon thinking about it, I do occasionally send mailings -- but only rarely and by FedEx.  I KNOW the recipient is going to open a FedEx.  I just have to make sure what I'm sending is worth it -- particularly considering the anticipation with which most people open a FedEx.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s for sure.  Upon thinking about it, I do occasionally send mailings &#8212; but only rarely and by FedEx.  I KNOW the recipient is going to open a FedEx.  I just have to make sure what I&#8217;m sending is worth it &#8212; particularly considering the anticipation with which most people open a FedEx.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2008/01/is-it-time-to-return-to-snail-mail.html/comment-page-1#comment-3573</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 17:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=2200#comment-3573</guid>
		<description>It all depends on the nature of what you're sending. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;If you could hand write a pitch to an editor on stationery? It would set you apart. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;How many folks have the time and client patience/funding to pull that off?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;One thing is for certain, if you have bullshit on email and send if offline, it's still bullshit.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Deep, I know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It all depends on the nature of what you&#8217;re sending. </p>
<p>If you could hand write a pitch to an editor on stationery? It would set you apart. </p>
<p>How many folks have the time and client patience/funding to pull that off?</p>
<p>One thing is for certain, if you have bullshit on email and send if offline, it&#8217;s still bullshit.</p>
<p>Deep, I know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
