June 6, 2007 in Media Orchard by sbaradell@ideagrove.com
New Wolff Olins Tagline: "Our Logos Bring Consumers to Their Knees"


Bad times for brand consultant Wolff Olins. From the U.K.’s Sun:

The controversial 2012 London Olympics logo was rocked by another blow last night — after it was ruled too dangerous to view on-screen … An animated version of the symbol used on TV and the internet had to be dropped because it could trigger fits in thousands of people.

The logo, a graffiti-style spelling of 2012 in shades of pink, blue, green and orange, was branded “hideous” when it was launched on Monday.

And Olympics bosses were left squirming with embarrassment after an epilepsy group reported 12 cases of people collapsing through looking at it. Epilepsy Action warned that 23,000 mainly young people in the UK were at risk from the TV and internet version.

Epilepsy Action spokeswoman Ingrid Burns said: “The logo was not safe for people with photosensitive epilepsy. Within hours of it being launched we received 12 reports of people suffering seizures.”

Leave it to the British tabloids to go with that “squirming with embarrassment” turn of phrase.

The Independent chimes in by offering a brief history of failed logos — just two days after the unveiling on Monday.

The “broken swastika,” as it has been dubbed, was designed and selected at a cost of about $800,000.

(Via Colin McEnroe)

 
3
June 4, 2007 in Media Orchard, Picks by sbaradell@ideagrove.com
Pick of the Thicket 6.4.07

Check out Spin Thicket for more media, marketing and PR links.

Technorati tags: , , , , , , ,

 
0
June 4, 2007 in Marketing by sbaradell@ideagrove.com
Guilty as Charged: Seven Marketing Buzzwords I Promise Never to Use Again

Our friend Joy Jennings has penned another post for Media Orchard that might even top her last one. Here it is.

Who can we blame for all the buzzwords that have crept into our day-to-day speech? We never seem to use these words outside of the office, but boy, do we love ‘em in meetings and e-mail. I think some people hear a good one, then can’t wait to trot it out in their next conference call.

See if you cringe at these top seven offenders. I confess to having used these, usually against my better judgment. Feel free to send your own least-favorite buzzwords to me.

1. “mission-critical”


I guess this one came around when some management guru told everyone to start writing mission statements, vision statements and elevator pitches. And then like glassy-eyed converts, we all spent 18 months bickering over conference calls about the best wording for such claptrap so that we could print it on the back of our business cards and hide it on a never-visited page of our Web site. Then anything critical became “mission-critical.” Well, folks, abort the mission.

2. “key”


This is a synonym for “important” that irks me no end. Primarily because it’s uttered throughout organizations on company time, but is never used when you’re talking with your friends and family about what’s important. Lose your keys. Please.

3. “initiative”


Companies used to have projects or maybe new products. Now any endeavor, particularly a new endeavor, is an “initiative.” God help me, I never want to write another press release about an initiative.

4. “strategic”


This is maybe the worst adjective on the list. Companies love to have “strategic” business partners. I suppose this makes the partners feel better. But really, wouldn’t you guess that any partner is going to be a business partner? And isn’t any business partner part of some kind of strategy? (And isn’t “partner” a legal term that we need to stay away from entirely?) The other crap-tastic usage is the strategic business unit. Two of those words are simply unnecessary. It’s just a unit, end of story. Basically, if you need to clearly label what you’re doing as strategic, you have bigger problems.

5. “going forward”


In the future, we’re all going to live our lives going forward. From now on, we’re going forward with a new plan. And we’ll continue our business careers, eschewing buzzwords like “going forward.”

6. “functionality”


Engineers and other product designers love to list the functionalities of their beloved products. I’m here to point out that “function” is a very useful noun that means the same thing. “Feature” is also an oldie but a goodie. “Capability” can also serve your needs quite well. Let’s all agree to do our very best to find other words instead of this grating buzzword.

7. “solution”


I feel guilty about this one because it is in the name of the last company I worked for. I couldn’t avoid it. But any business journalist will tell you that they particularly dislike this buzzword. Lots of technology companies can’t bring themselves to say that they have products, systems or even services — no, they must have solutions. But never to problems. Nuh-uh, that’s a bad word that is rarely uttered. No, they have solutions to “challenges.”

You probably have other buzzword examples. I do too. “Value-added,” “heads-up,” “learnings” and “think outside the box” can all drop out of the lexicon yesterday if it was up to me.

Buzzwords are bad because they get in the way of clear communication. Our colleagues think they make them sound smart — or they’re so immersed in corporate-speak that they truly can’t think of a better alternative. As communicators, it’s up to us to show them the way.

Joy Jennings is a freelance writer who helps organizations with marketing and public relations projects.

 
2
June 3, 2007 in Media Orchard, Picks by sbaradell@ideagrove.com
Pick of the Thicket 6.3.07

Check out Spin Thicket for more media, marketing and PR links.

Technorati tags: , , , , , , ,

 
0
June 2, 2007 in Celebrity, Media Orchard by sbaradell@ideagrove.com
Forget Stoli Hotel; How About Stoli Gulag Archipelago?


Vodka’s our favorite hooch, and Stoli’s our favorite vodka — but when it comes to promoting the brand in the United States, the Russians have been about as effective as their little Communist experiment back in the day.

In fact, here’s the story of their latest marketing Five Year Plan: They’ve had five unrelated ad campaigns over the past five years — and none of them bear repeating.

Brand Manager Adam Rosen explains: “We have to have an answer to the question, ‘Russian vodka. So what?’”

And their multimillion dollar answer to that question? This thing.

Don’t bother looking around the “Stoli Hotel” to find any content of interest; there’s nothing there, unless you don’t know how to make a vodka tonic. And the flirty virtual receptionists and bartenders don’t even strip to their undies — as you would expect from a site like this.

The Web site is actually tied to an event marketing campaign — a series of “pop-up” hotels in a small number of major cities, open for a month at a time.

The first was in L.A. in May; the other cities on the tour are New York, Chicago, San Francisco and Miami. If folks in the other four cities are curious what to look forward to, here’s a description from the LA Daily News:

Have you heard about the Stoli Hotel? The latest temporary hot spot to hit Hollywood (on Ivar between Sunset and Hollywood boulevards) is a faux hotel, complete with doorman and check-in babes, VIP bedrooms and even a spa offering free services, all sponsored by Stolichnaya Vodka, promoting their new flavored spirits.

All during May, the parties are raging, from a GQ bash early on to Wednesday night’s Playboy party, a surreal blend of sultry centerfolds, burly bodyguards and even a tiny midget (who was not Verne Troyer) who spent most of the evening riding through the crush on the shoulders of his very large male companion…

…One bright-eyed male was overheard to comment, “There’s more silicone on display here than I’ve ever seen in my life!” And he wasn’t kidding.

Sounds OK, we guess. We like silicone as much as the next guy, after all.

Until you realize that Stoli has confessed it’s blown its “entire internet advertising budget” on this “traveling hotel” with lame Web sidekick.

So … let’s see. If all goes well, you boost Stoli sales in five cities with a total population of, say, 20 million — out of a total U.S. population of 300 million. The rest of us get to look at this.

If Stalin were still around, he’d send you dummies to a gulag somewhere.

 
0