July 28, 2006 in Media Orchard, PR Agencies, Public Relations by sbaradell@ideagrove.com
Strumpette: Two Strikes and You’re Outed

Yeah, we know — we’re writing two Strumpette posts in a row. But we have to call your attention to this piece by Ron May and this one by Mike Driehorst — which go a long way toward outing Brian Connolly as the mastermind (pea-brain?) behind Strumpette once and for all.

 
1
July 28, 2006 in Media Orchard, PR Agencies, PR and Pop Culture, Public Relations by sbaradell@ideagrove.com
Casting the Strumpette Movie: Guess What — You’re In It!

Strumpette informed us on Wednesday that “my agent is working on a movie deal, and I am going to be profiled in the NYT.”

Forget the New York Times; they already got scooped on the big Strumpette story by the Washington Post. And no one reads those liberal rags anyway, right Dee?

But the movie deal is intriguing. What would the story be? Who would the characters be? And how would we cast it?

Since Strumpette is an anonymous cabal, possibly led by disgruntled ex-PR vet Brian Connolly, that’s a tough casting job. To make the movie work, Strumpette would have to actually be a woman, unlike Brian, and would have to be less intellectually pretentious and mean-spirited than the members of this anonymous cabal.

Let’s face it — what Hollywood wants is The Devil Wears Prada crossed with Sex and the City and a sprinkling of Jerry Maguire. The story is this: a sexy, promiscuous babe in the PR industry finally gets fed up with the hypocrisy and double-dealing around her and decides to destroy her massive, evil New York PR firm in the name of all that is good and holy. In the process, she recaptures her soul and decides to stop sleeping around and settle down with a nice man with a hint of stubble.

The movie also need villains, of course — lots of villains for Strumpette to skewer. Folks like Richard Edelman, Steve Rubel, Shel Holtz, Phil Gomes, Andrea Weckerle, Susan Getgood, Kami Huyse, and all the others Strumpette has defamed on the blog. All of these people, and others, should be characters in the movie. After all, Strumpette certainly writes more about the alleged foibles of little PR bloggers than any other subject matter.

So here’s the question: Who should play you (or someone else) in the Strumpette movie?

Post your suggestions in comments, and we’ll follow up with the final cast — complete with comparison pics — later.

Technorati tags:

 
July 28, 2006 in Media Orchard, Public Relations by sbaradell@ideagrove.com
Loose Links Sink Blogs?

Great article from the Poynter site. Excerpt:

On the Ethics of Linking: The Indianapolis Story

It began with the death of Mpozi Tolbert, a 34 year-old photographer who collapsed and died in the newsroom of The Indianapolis Star on July 3. Three weeks later, debate over the circumstances of his death has raised two sets of questions. The first deals with the facts of what happened that night.

Ruth Holladay, a former Star columnist used her personal Web site to accuse the paper’s management of failing to maintain safety standards that might have saved Tolbert’s life. Dennis Ryerson, editor and vice president of the Star, dismissed her charges as “reprehensible … erroneous and hurtful.”

The second set of questions deals with what’s happened, journalistically, since that night. Specifically, the questions involve links from the Romenesko page on Poynter Online to the allegations Holladay published on her blog. Ryerson denounced Poynter’s handling of the links in e-mail messages to Poynter’s Jim Romenesko and Bob Steele…

Poynter’s links to Holladay’s blog raise questions about how journalists in general — and Poynter in particular — should handle coverage of the kind of important but often unconfirmed — and sometimes just plain wrong — comments that populate some of the new media landscape.

Read this piece; it touches on issues all bloggers should think about.

 
2
July 28, 2006 in Media, Media Orchard by sbaradell@ideagrove.com
Why Most Journalists Dislike Fox News: It’s Not the Reason You Think

According to Dee Rambeau, July is Media Orchard’s “Pick on Fox News” month — so since July is almost over, I thought I’d better get in one last lick.

This may be hard for people who have never been journalists to understand, but I do not dislike Fox News because my politics are left of Roger Ailes’. I dislike Fox News because it undermines the efforts of all journalists who work hard to be objective in their coverage of the day’s events.

Ailes smirks that Fox News is “Fair and Balanced” when everyone at that network knows that it has a political agenda that comes down from on high. That smirk not only makes Fox News a liar — it also mocks the integrity of all journalists who have committed their lives and careers to the ideals of objective journalism.

Let me explain something to those of you who have never been reporters; for most journalists, integrity is everything. Say what you will about reporters’ ethics, but I know from experience that you’ll hear more serious discussion of ethical questions in a newsroom than you’ll ever hear in a boardroom. Most reporters care passionately about what they do — and just as passionately about doing it right.

Journalists, in general, don’t enter the profession to make money. If money were their goal, they would apply their college educations and insatiable curiosity in more profitable directions — such as becoming political operatives.

Young people enter journalism, for the most part, because they want to make a difference. Their egos are fed not by the money they make, but by the impact they have. Journalists have impact by covering controversy and causing change. If change is anti-conservative — in the true sense of the word “conservative” — it is not anti-Republican.

Republicans and Democrats have worked together peacefully and productively in newsrooms for years, because they have always used the same rulebook. When I was a reporter in Lynchburg, Va., I remember covering a series of stories on a politically charged issue with a reporter who was as Republican as they come. I don’t think we discussed our personal politics once while writing that series — because we both were more committed to the discipline of journalism than to our politics.

While more individual journalists may tend to hold so-called “liberal” views than so-called “conservative” views, none of Fox News’ competitors — not CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN or MSNBC — issues dictates from the executive suite about how stories should be covered. Only Fox News does that. None of Fox News’ competitors has a political filter for hiring talent. Only Fox News has that.

That’s why “Fair and Balanced” is an example of the Big Lie. And why all of us — no matter our politics — should be a little bothered by that. It’s certainly why virtually all journalists who take objectivity seriously dislike Fox News.

One last point: This phenomenon works both ways. I once worked at an alternative weekly — one with its own set of political views. In that setting, I was the staff “conservative.” I once wrote an article that the chain’s editorial chief thought was too “conservative” in tone, and — in so many words — he told me as much.

Having been trained in daily newspaper newsrooms — where it was about what you learned from your reporting, not what you believed beforehand — I was shocked by the complaint. It wasn’t long before I left that alt weekly.

So when I knock Fox News, it’s not because I worry about its politics. No, I worry that the ratings success of Fox News will undermine the profession of journalism generally in the public’s mind, so that any reporter who endeavors to cover stories objectively will be greeted with a Roger Ailes-inspired smirk.

 
July 28, 2006 in Marketing, Media Orchard, PR and Pop Culture by sbaradell@ideagrove.com
"I’m Really Disappointed That This Is Going to Occur on Sunday When People Should Be in Church"

Sigh — another strip club publicity stunt. We get so tired of reporting on these.

Strippers plan trip down New Braunfels river

NEW BRAUNFELS, Texas — In the midst of attempts to crack down on raunchy and rowdy behavior during traditional summertime tubing river trips through this city, a San Antonio topless club is planning a tubing excursion featuring strippers.

Trey Maddox, a manager at Palace Men’s Club, said Sunday’s excursion — during which men can pay $25 to join the strippers — isn’t meant to fly in the face of the city’s new rules…

City Councilman Ken Valentine isn’t so sure.

“I’m really disappointed that this is going to occur on Sunday when people should be in church,” he said. “I hope they behave themselves and keep their clothes on, but I’m not sure they will because strippers are trained to take off their clothes.”…

Mayor Bruce Boyer said he thought it was unfortunate that the San Antonio club is taking advantage of the situation “to get free publicity.”

 
2