<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &quot;Utilize&quot; vs. &quot;Use&quot;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/06/utilize-vs-use.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/06/utilize-vs-use.html</link>
	<description>The Idea Grove is a full-service agency specializing in public relations, marketing and Web design.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:07:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/06/utilize-vs-use.html/comment-page-1#comment-3589</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 01:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=1278#comment-3589</guid>
		<description>&quot;Use&quot; can still be used to achieve the same meaning as th &quot;utilize&quot; sentence in the example, and a better sentence results:  &quot;The teachers found no use for the computers.&quot;  Same meaning, yet the new sentence has an active verb and a simpler, more muscular style.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The problem with &quot;utilize&quot; is not that it is functionally interchangeable with &quot;use&quot;.  The problem is that it always sounds like pretentious claptrap, and there is always a better way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Use&#8221; can still be used to achieve the same meaning as th &#8220;utilize&#8221; sentence in the example, and a better sentence results:  &#8220;The teachers found no use for the computers.&#8221;  Same meaning, yet the new sentence has an active verb and a simpler, more muscular style.  </p>
<p>The problem with &#8220;utilize&#8221; is not that it is functionally interchangeable with &#8220;use&#8221;.  The problem is that it always sounds like pretentious claptrap, and there is always a better way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: catsav</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/06/utilize-vs-use.html/comment-page-1#comment-2314</link>
		<dc:creator>catsav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 20:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=1278#comment-2314</guid>
		<description>I, personally, have always found &quot;utilize&quot; to be more impactful than &quot;use.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, personally, have always found &#8220;utilize&#8221; to be more impactful than &#8220;use.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/06/utilize-vs-use.html/comment-page-1#comment-2311</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=1278#comment-2311</guid>
		<description>This morning, my boss said &quot;notate,&quot; when he clearly meant &quot;note.&quot;  I also -- no joke -- heard him refer to himself as &quot;the decider&quot; of our department.  Sadly, it was not even a post-ironic Dubya reference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This morning, my boss said &#8220;notate,&#8221; when he clearly meant &#8220;note.&#8221;  I also &#8212; no joke &#8212; heard him refer to himself as &#8220;the decider&#8221; of our department.  Sadly, it was not even a post-ironic Dubya reference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SB</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/06/utilize-vs-use.html/comment-page-1#comment-2307</link>
		<dc:creator>SB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 16:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=1278#comment-2307</guid>
		<description>I no longer say &quot;orient.&quot; Now I say &quot;asia.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I no longer say &#8220;orient.&#8221; Now I say &#8220;asia.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ike</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/06/utilize-vs-use.html/comment-page-1#comment-2306</link>
		<dc:creator>Ike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 16:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=1278#comment-2306</guid>
		<description>&quot;Utilize&quot;-abusers are also more likely to say &quot;orientate&quot; instead of &quot;orient.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Utilize&#8221;-abusers are also more likely to say &#8220;orientate&#8221; instead of &#8220;orient.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

