<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sexy Professions for Women: Do the Stereotypes Damage the Brand?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/06/sexy-professions-for-women-do-the-stereotypes-damage-the-brand.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/06/sexy-professions-for-women-do-the-stereotypes-damage-the-brand.html</link>
	<description>The Idea Grove is a full-service agency specializing in public relations, marketing and Web design.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:07:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SB</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/06/sexy-professions-for-women-do-the-stereotypes-damage-the-brand.html/comment-page-1#comment-2224</link>
		<dc:creator>SB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 02:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=1229#comment-2224</guid>
		<description>BN--&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Thanks for the knowledge...and glad to find your blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BN&#8211;</p>
<p>Thanks for the knowledge&#8230;and glad to find your blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B. N. Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/06/sexy-professions-for-women-do-the-stereotypes-damage-the-brand.html/comment-page-1#comment-2220</link>
		<dc:creator>B. N. Sullivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 00:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=1229#comment-2220</guid>
		<description>Very interesting article -- and it&#039;s also interesting that all of the comments (so far) have addressed only one of the occupations you cited.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Flight attendants will be the first to tell you that their primary role aboard an aircraft is safety; their secondary role is service.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The FAA (and similar regulatory agencies outside the U.S.) requires commercial air carriers to have a certain number of flight attendants aboard each flight &lt;i&gt;for safety reasons&lt;/i&gt;.  Their number one, legally mandated role is to attend to the safety and well-being of passengers, up to and including (god forbid) efficiently evacuating passengers from the plane in the case of an emergency landing/accident.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;In the U.S., the FAA currently requires one flight attendant for every 50 passenger seats on a plane.  (50 seats = 1 F/A; 50-100 seats = 2 F/As, and so on.)  Airlines are free to add additional cabin crew beyond the minimum if they wish.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;For the record, the now defunct Hooters Air had aboard each flight the required number of &lt;i&gt;real&lt;/i&gt; flight attendants, who were fully trained in all safety procedures.  In addition, each flight had a few &quot;Hooters Girls&quot; who were &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; flight attendants.  They were there solely to entertain the passengers.  The Hooters Girls had no safety function.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting article &#8212; and it&#8217;s also interesting that all of the comments (so far) have addressed only one of the occupations you cited.</p>
<p>Flight attendants will be the first to tell you that their primary role aboard an aircraft is safety; their secondary role is service.</p>
<p>The FAA (and similar regulatory agencies outside the U.S.) requires commercial air carriers to have a certain number of flight attendants aboard each flight <i>for safety reasons</i>.  Their number one, legally mandated role is to attend to the safety and well-being of passengers, up to and including (god forbid) efficiently evacuating passengers from the plane in the case of an emergency landing/accident.</p>
<p>In the U.S., the FAA currently requires one flight attendant for every 50 passenger seats on a plane.  (50 seats = 1 F/A; 50-100 seats = 2 F/As, and so on.)  Airlines are free to add additional cabin crew beyond the minimum if they wish.</p>
<p>For the record, the now defunct Hooters Air had aboard each flight the required number of <i>real</i> flight attendants, who were fully trained in all safety procedures.  In addition, each flight had a few &#8220;Hooters Girls&#8221; who were <i>not</i> flight attendants.  They were there solely to entertain the passengers.  The Hooters Girls had no safety function.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Make the logo bigger</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/06/sexy-professions-for-women-do-the-stereotypes-damage-the-brand.html/comment-page-1#comment-2201</link>
		<dc:creator>Make the logo bigger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 22:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=1229#comment-2201</guid>
		<description>&quot;Of course, if you wanted to change things, you could have have committed to only flying on Hooters Air.&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The only airline where turbulence was a value-add.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Of course, if you wanted to change things, you could have have committed to only flying on Hooters Air.&#8221;</p>
<p>The only airline where turbulence was a value-add.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SB</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/06/sexy-professions-for-women-do-the-stereotypes-damage-the-brand.html/comment-page-1#comment-2193</link>
		<dc:creator>SB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 11:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=1229#comment-2193</guid>
		<description>Ann: Sounds like a new formula for the Village People.  Where do I apply?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ann: Sounds like a new formula for the Village People.  Where do I apply?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann Handley</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/06/sexy-professions-for-women-do-the-stereotypes-damage-the-brand.html/comment-page-1#comment-2192</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann Handley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 10:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=1229#comment-2192</guid>
		<description>Interesting and entertaining post, Scott! I would suspect that the same sort of stereotyping &quot;branding&quot; would hold true for fantasy-inducing men&#039;s professions...? You know -- like lumberjacks, construction workers, sailors, and strategic PR consultants? : )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting and entertaining post, Scott! I would suspect that the same sort of stereotyping &#8220;branding&#8221; would hold true for fantasy-inducing men&#8217;s professions&#8230;? You know &#8212; like lumberjacks, construction workers, sailors, and strategic PR consultants? : )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

