If your personal view is in line with the professional view, you’ll never have a problem.

(If I understand your question correctly.)

For instance, I’d never take a job with Exxon Mobile. Greedy bastards they are. Why would I try and tout a positive message from such a company that I didn’t agree with? And, if I did happen to have a job with Exxon and was charged with promoting a message I think did people wrong or put them at risk, it would be my job to argue with Exxon and propose an alternative. In the end, it is in the company’s interest to disagree sometimes.

There are good companies out there, with legitimate, positive messages.

How do you separate the personal view from the professional one when people may be at risk?

Have a good one, Ike.

You’re still criticizing a PR person for a political opinion. You are so certain of yours that you are crusading: ergo, Jody is either an idiot or a whore.

Before you can call her a shameful whore, you have to prove that she’s not an idiot or misinformed.

If you want to blast people for being idiots, then this becomes a general soapbox and not a PR soapbox.

Happy Birthday to me.

I read the post you referenced. It contains this statement:

“a few vocal individuals are quoted ‘over and over’ again, when in fact there are a variety of opinions”

The fact is, there have been over 900 peer-reviewed studies and none has questioned global warming. 900 is more than a few.