<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gannett Newspapers Seeking Minority Dial-a-Quotes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/06/gannett-newspapers-seeking-minority-dial-a-quotes.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/06/gannett-newspapers-seeking-minority-dial-a-quotes.html</link>
	<description>Bringing You Media News, Marketing Views, Celebrity Culture &#38; Political Spin Since February 2005</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 04:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Deb S.</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/06/gannett-newspapers-seeking-minority-dial-a-quotes.html/comment-page-1#comment-2257</link>
		<dc:creator>Deb S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 20:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=1216#comment-2257</guid>
		<description>"They said they feared the day they might have to delete an insightful quote from a majority source in favor of a less useful quote from someone who would help the newspaper meet corporate goals."&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This comment suggests that a &lt;i&gt;minority&lt;/i&gt; source has a greater liklihood of being "less useful" than a &lt;i&gt;majority&lt;/i&gt; source.  If this is the case, the premise is flawed.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The fact of the matter is that many journalists (and PR folks), just like people in other professionals, don't diversify their bank of sources.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;By implementing this policy, it seems that Gannett is not talking about diversification just for the sake of it.  As I see it, the company wants to guarantee using the best source.  Oftentimes - and I'm speaking frankly - that person may &lt;b&gt;not&lt;/b&gt; be white.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I think Gannett is showing leadership and vision.  Good for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;They said they feared the day they might have to delete an insightful quote from a majority source in favor of a less useful quote from someone who would help the newspaper meet corporate goals.&#8221;</p>
<p>This comment suggests that a <i>minority</i> source has a greater liklihood of being &#8220;less useful&#8221; than a <i>majority</i> source.  If this is the case, the premise is flawed.</p>
<p>The fact of the matter is that many journalists (and PR folks), just like people in other professionals, don&#8217;t diversify their bank of sources.  </p>
<p>By implementing this policy, it seems that Gannett is not talking about diversification just for the sake of it.  As I see it, the company wants to guarantee using the best source.  Oftentimes - and I&#8217;m speaking frankly - that person may <b>not</b> be white.</p>
<p>I think Gannett is showing leadership and vision.  Good for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
