"They said they feared the day they might have to delete an insightful quote from a majority source in favor of a less useful quote from someone who would help the newspaper meet corporate goals."This comment suggests that a minority source has a greater liklihood of being "less useful" than a majority source. If this is the case, the premise is flawed.The fact of the matter is that many journalists (and PR folks), just like people in other professionals, don't diversify their bank of sources. By implementing this policy, it seems that Gannett is not talking about diversification just for the sake of it. As I see it, the company wants to guarantee using the best source. Oftentimes - and I'm speaking frankly - that person may not be white.I think Gannett is showing leadership and vision. Good for them.
1 Comments
Gannett Newspapers Seeking Minority Dial-a-Quotes
From the NY Times via Romenesko:
We get the idea. Still, it’s a little weird.
We can see the ProfNet request now:
We’re looking for experts who can provide our readers with advice regarding the asteroid that is currently zooming toward Earth.
But only if they’re black.
Technorati tags: PR, Public Relations, Gannett
loading...
Tags: minorities, newspapers