May 29, 2006 in Media Orchard, Social Media Marketing by sbaradell@ideagrove.com
Technorati: A Weakening Link? Part 2

We’re a little worried about Technorati.

Here’s just a recent example of the system’s current problems:

Technorati recognizes three links to a post we wrote on Friday (“Which Media, Marketing or PR Blog Is the Most Readable?”)

It catches links from

Desirable Roasted Coffee
A PR Guru’s Musings
Strive Notes

It does not catch links from

Mike’s Points
paidContent.org
Jaffe Juice
My Catholic Blog
Student PR
Charles on … anything that comes along

Who knows — maybe other blogs linked to it, too. Those are just some that tracked back to the post or referred a number of visitors.

This is one post on one blog. What else is going on out there?

Update: Technorati also missed a link from The One That’s Not About Music.

Did you link, too? Let us know.

Technorati tags:

 
7
May 29, 2006 in Media, Media Orchard, PR Agencies, Social Media Marketing by sbaradell@ideagrove.com
Busted!


How embarrassing.

An Independent Sources investigation reveals that “Google Trends data shows a stronger than expected following [for French newsbabe Melissa Theuriau] in the Lone Star state.”


Richardson, Texas. International headquarters of the Idea Grove.

Busted.

Meanwhile, in actual Melissa Theuriau news, France’s No. 1 Melissa fan site has been redesigned on WordPress. Check it out.

Technorati tags:

 
1
May 29, 2006 in Media Orchard by sbaradell@ideagrove.com
Pick of the Orchard 5.29.06 (Happy Memorial Day!)

  • Memorial Day weekend brings yard sales [We included this because it reminds us -- a little too much -- of the stories we were forced to write at the Lynchburg (Va.) News & Advance.] (Hornell [NY] Evening Tribune)
  • D.C. Comics: Batwoman now a “lesbian socialite” (UPI)
  • Mea Culpa!: A Course in Public Apology (Working Knowledge)

    Technorati tags: , , , , , , ,

  •  
    0
    May 28, 2006 in Media Orchard, Social Media Marketing by sbaradell@ideagrove.com
    For Dallasites: Check Out Unfair Park


    Unfair Park is a blog by the folks at the Dallas Observer, our city’s New Times weekly. In a past life, we worked (briefly and unhappily) at the Observer. We formed friendships in our Dallas Times Herald days with the Observer’s two current top dogs, Julie Lyons and Robert Wilonsky. We even helped Julie get her first freelance gig at the Observer; today, she’s the editor.

    (Interestingly, we also got to know Dallas’ current mayor, Laura Miller, in our short Observer stint.)

    Since then, we’ve lost touch with Julie and Robert — but both are highly talented writers who contribute frequently to Unfair Park. Check it out.

    Technorati tags: , ,

     
    1
    May 28, 2006 in Celebrity, Media, Media Orchard by sbaradell@ideagrove.com
    A Literary Analysis of "Remembrance of Who I Am," by Britney Spears


    Famed academic Dr. O.R. Chard has kindly agreed to analyze the following poem:

    Remembrance of Who I Am, by Britney Spears

    No more chains
    That you gave me.
    Enough of pain
    Now I’m craving
    Something sweet, so delight
    How do you stand sleeping at night?

    (Dr. Chard: Criticism so far published has concentrated upon two areas in interpreting this poem. First, the conclusion that the poem is an experience shown from the point of view of a new mother who is frustrated with her choice of provider. Second, that the spacing and odd syntax are suggestive of Spears’ harried life in the media spotlight. The effect here is to communicate hustle, bustle, and speed, but also the child-like noise of children playing, perhaps imitating a whistle.)

    Silly patterns that we follow
    You pull me in
    I’m being swallowed.
    By the ones you think you love
    They pull you down
    You can’t see up above.

    (Dr. Chard: A scatological semantic field begins to emerge from the poem. The poem contains a breathless quality, and the language is structured like a nursery rhyme. Unfortunately, it reflects a limited linguistic knowledge of children’s songs and chants. The slang reference to “silly patterns,” as I would interpret, means to defecate in one’s pants.)

    Manipulation is the key
    They screw it in
    Because you’re naive.

    You come to me now
    Why do you bother?
    Remember the Bible
    The sins of the Father.
    What you do
    You pass down
    No wonder why
    I lost my crown.

    (Dr. Chard: This passage serves merely to illustrate the propensity of the poem to contain multiple, and equally important, readings within itself. How can one define “evil” without recourse to “good”? The struggle to determine “truth” in this poem remains undecidable since neither one nor the other can assume the supremacy.)

    You don’t see me now
    You ask yourself why
    My crown is back
    And it’s way too high
    For you to be in my presence
    Especially my son
    You should bow down
    I’ve only just begun.

    The guilt you fed me
    Made me weak.
    The voodoo you did
    I couldn’t speak.

    (Dr. Chard: Sexual orgies, intoxication, deviant sexual practices, nature, and clear hints of pedophilia abound in every line of this poem.)

    You’re awakening
    The phone is ringing.
    Resurrection of my soul
    The fear I’m bringing.

    What will you say
    And what will you do?
    She’s not the same person that you’re used to.

    (Dr. Chard: To return to the inside / outside dichotomy: the reader is first pulled inside the poem since the visual elements of the poem fail to convey direct, unimpeded access to the thing itself. The reader goes inside the poem — the verbal / semantic — to find meaning. However, because of the decomposition of the words in the poem, the multiple puns, allusions, and meanings, the reader is forced into other systems of signification outside the poem. Thus, the reader looks outward toward fields of French and numerical representation. This oscillation between inside / outside is one of the many undecided issues within the poem.)

    You trick me one, twice, now it’s three.
    Look who’s smiling now
    Damn, it’s good to be me!

    *This is for everyone who thinks they know me…

    (Dr. Chard: You got me. I have no idea what the hell this chick is talking about. The last line, in particular, is likely to remain a mysterious mystery for those who would attempt to interpret its mysterious mysteriousness.)

    Thank you, Dr. Chard.

    (And thanks to Iain Landles as well.)

    Technorati tags:

     
    2