Hoo-boy.
Here ’tis.
George Eliot in reverse? Not.
This entry was posted
on Wednesday, April 5th, 2006 at 2:29 pm and is filed under Media Orchard.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Scott I haven’t kept up with Smurfette like you have, was the source of his man-crush on Steve ever confirmed?
Nevermind, I just went back and read the question I asked, and realized I didn’t want to hear the answer.
Scott,
You are really just harassing now. It servers no other purpose. Did you even read the commentary? No. You didn’t.
Seriously, it makes you look like you’ve got some hang up. I think you do.
Bottom line: if I were some transvestite like your childish imagination wants to take you, so what. I still have more significant things to talk about than you.
- Amanda
Amanda,
You’re right; I do have an issue. Two actually:
1. Your dishonesty.
2. Your unrelenting mean-spiritedness and negativity.
Sorry. Pet peeves of mine.
Scott
Oh — and I forgot one:
Your pomposity.
That one should have come first.
Scott,
I have two pet peeves, as well:
1. I despise the literal minded who think anything more complex than what the time is, is likely dishonest;
2. I find more distasteful those that find facing reality mean-spirited.
Fact is you been Salieri-ed and that bothers you. You’ve written 800 plus posts with little to say.
Ciao,
- Amanda
- Amanda
That being the case, there’s no requirement that you keep coming back every day.
I absolve you.