<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does the Religious Right Get More TV Coverage than Mainline Christians?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/03/does-the-religious-right-get-more-tv-coverage-than-mainline-christians.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/03/does-the-religious-right-get-more-tv-coverage-than-mainline-christians.html</link>
	<description>The Idea Grove is a full-service agency specializing in public relations, marketing and Web design.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:07:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/03/does-the-religious-right-get-more-tv-coverage-than-mainline-christians.html/comment-page-1#comment-1243</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 17:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=857#comment-1243</guid>
		<description>It being Sunday there might be a proclivity for a religious tone, and if what I hear is correct conservatives tend to be more religious...&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Religious figures on news/talk shows...I cant say I favor that at all, but there&#039;s no rule against it. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I also don&#039;t favor &quot;equal access to the air waves from the networks&quot;, as Media Matters champions. The networks will eventaully pay a price in viewership if the market doesnt want to see these fundamentalists, right? &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Besides, who would enforce this &quot;equal access&quot;? The government? &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;OH, dear. That would be a fabulous step (or gigantic leap) in the wrong direction.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;If the networks are blocking out other religious views, then shame on them. But regulating the airwaves like Media Matters suggests is a BAD BAD BAD BAD BAD IDEA.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Far from solving the problem...I can only imagine the possibilities for corruption and over-regulation and litigation stemming from any type of government regulation of viewpoints expressed on TV or radio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It being Sunday there might be a proclivity for a religious tone, and if what I hear is correct conservatives tend to be more religious&#8230;</p>
<p>Religious figures on news/talk shows&#8230;I cant say I favor that at all, but there&#8217;s no rule against it. </p>
<p>I also don&#8217;t favor &#8220;equal access to the air waves from the networks&#8221;, as Media Matters champions. The networks will eventaully pay a price in viewership if the market doesnt want to see these fundamentalists, right? </p>
<p>Besides, who would enforce this &#8220;equal access&#8221;? The government? </p>
<p>OH, dear. That would be a fabulous step (or gigantic leap) in the wrong direction.</p>
<p>If the networks are blocking out other religious views, then shame on them. But regulating the airwaves like Media Matters suggests is a BAD BAD BAD BAD BAD IDEA.</p>
<p>Far from solving the problem&#8230;I can only imagine the possibilities for corruption and over-regulation and litigation stemming from any type of government regulation of viewpoints expressed on TV or radio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alice</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/03/does-the-religious-right-get-more-tv-coverage-than-mainline-christians.html/comment-page-1#comment-1240</link>
		<dc:creator>Alice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 13:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=857#comment-1240</guid>
		<description>As a UCC member, thank you for posting about this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a UCC member, thank you for posting about this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

