March 28, 2006 in Media, Media Orchard, Politics by Scott Baradell

Does the Religious Right Get More TV Coverage than Mainline Christians?

Yep. We don’t think there’s any question about it. And the United Church of Christ is trying to do something about it:

A recent study completed by Media Matters concludes what we have long known to be true: the networks favor the Relgious Right.

In this particular study, an analysis of guests on Sunday Morning talk shows revealed a pronounced bias in the percentage of conservative pundits versus progressives. In fact, the report shows that the networks frequently allow these shows to be used to attacks progressives and their ideas.

Why do James Dobson, Franklin Graham, Al Moehler, Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell warrant seemingly endless coverage when ministries of the United Church of Christ, Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) and Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, among others, rarely receive a single mention?

Networks can’t play favorites. Mainline religious communities like the UCC have a right to be heard along with everyone else. So, starting today, we are reaching out to all of you once again and asking for your help to demand equal access to the air waves from the networks.

Pretending that fundamentalist types are the only Christians out there is a way for the networks to keep the debate simple — just the way they like it. You know: Red State, Blue State, etc. etc.

More power (and coverage) to the UCC.

(Via Street Prophets)

Technorati tags: , , ,

GD Star Rating
loading...
Dallas Marketing and Dallas Web Design picture of pixel

Tags: ,

2 Comments
Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

It being Sunday there might be a proclivity for a religious tone, and if what I hear is correct conservatives tend to be more religious...Religious figures on news/talk shows...I cant say I favor that at all, but there's no rule against it. I also don't favor "equal access to the air waves from the networks", as Media Matters champions. The networks will eventaully pay a price in viewership if the market doesnt want to see these fundamentalists, right? Besides, who would enforce this "equal access"? The government? OH, dear. That would be a fabulous step (or gigantic leap) in the wrong direction.If the networks are blocking out other religious views, then shame on them. But regulating the airwaves like Media Matters suggests is a BAD BAD BAD BAD BAD IDEA.Far from solving the problem...I can only imagine the possibilities for corruption and over-regulation and litigation stemming from any type of government regulation of viewpoints expressed on TV or radio.

As a UCC member, thank you for posting about this.