<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Your Call Is Important to Us</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/02/your-call-is-important-to-us.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/02/your-call-is-important-to-us.html</link>
	<description>Bringing You Media News, Marketing Views, Celebrity Culture &#38; Political Spin Since February 2005</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/02/your-call-is-important-to-us.html/comment-page-1#comment-816</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=668#comment-816</guid>
		<description>check out what people are saying in Radio Shack's hometown.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;http://pod01.prospero.com/n/pfx/forum.aspx?msg=72&amp;nav=messages&amp;webtag=kr-fortworthtm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>check out what people are saying in Radio Shack&#8217;s hometown.</p>
<p><a href="http://pod01.prospero.com/n/pfx/forum.aspx?msg=72&#038;nav=messages&#038;webtag=kr-fortworthtm" rel="nofollow">http://pod01.prospero.com/n/pfx/forum.aspx?msg=72&#038;nav=messages&#038;webtag=kr-fortworthtm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SB</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/02/your-call-is-important-to-us.html/comment-page-1#comment-808</link>
		<dc:creator>SB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=668#comment-808</guid>
		<description>Well, that's the battle that lawyers and PR people always have, isn't it? Usually though, saying you're wrong -- when you actually are wrong -- doesn't hurt anything more than your ego.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, that&#8217;s the battle that lawyers and PR people always have, isn&#8217;t it? Usually though, saying you&#8217;re wrong &#8212; when you actually are wrong &#8212; doesn&#8217;t hurt anything more than your ego.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/02/your-call-is-important-to-us.html/comment-page-1#comment-807</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=668#comment-807</guid>
		<description>But, Scott, that would be too simple and too easy. &lt;br/&gt;I don't mean to cut public figures &amp; officials any slack . . . but with lawsuits and vicious campaign ads, anything resembling pure honesty will get you in trouble.&lt;br/&gt;AGH! The cynic in me is coming out. &lt;br/&gt;Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But, Scott, that would be too simple and too easy. <br />I don&#8217;t mean to cut public figures &#038; officials any slack . . . but with lawsuits and vicious campaign ads, anything resembling pure honesty will get you in trouble.<br />AGH! The cynic in me is coming out. <br />Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SB</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/02/your-call-is-important-to-us.html/comment-page-1#comment-806</link>
		<dc:creator>SB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=668#comment-806</guid>
		<description>That's true, Mike.  But "I accept responsibility" falls short of an apology.  You can accept responsility without ever admitting you did something wrong. How about just saying: "I did wrong. I'm sorry"?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s true, Mike.  But &#8220;I accept responsibility&#8221; falls short of an apology.  You can accept responsility without ever admitting you did something wrong. How about just saying: &#8220;I did wrong. I&#8217;m sorry&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/02/your-call-is-important-to-us.html/comment-page-1#comment-805</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 13:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=668#comment-805</guid>
		<description>Often, if someone mis-reads the tone of an "I accept the responsibility" comment, it still won't be taken as genuine.&lt;br/&gt;Much of how well an apology is taken depends on who is hearing it, and his/her perception of the person apologizing. If you're already skeptical of the Bush Administration, nothing Cheney will say is good enough. &lt;br/&gt;If you are skeptical of business (including PR folks), even a sincere apology may not sound sincere enough.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Skepticism and mistrust of public officials and figures seems to be awfully high right now -- no matter what they say.&lt;br/&gt;Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Often, if someone mis-reads the tone of an &#8220;I accept the responsibility&#8221; comment, it still won&#8217;t be taken as genuine.<br />Much of how well an apology is taken depends on who is hearing it, and his/her perception of the person apologizing. If you&#8217;re already skeptical of the Bush Administration, nothing Cheney will say is good enough. <br />If you are skeptical of business (including PR folks), even a sincere apology may not sound sincere enough.</p>
<p>Skepticism and mistrust of public officials and figures seems to be awfully high right now &#8212; no matter what they say.<br />Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
