<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will You Sign My Technorati Favorites List?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/02/will-you-sign-my-technorati-favorites-list.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/02/will-you-sign-my-technorati-favorites-list.html</link>
	<description>Bringing You Media News, Marketing Views, Celebrity Culture &#38; Political Spin Since February 2005</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SB</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/02/will-you-sign-my-technorati-favorites-list.html/comment-page-1#comment-868</link>
		<dc:creator>SB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 16:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=686#comment-868</guid>
		<description>50 blogs is about right for me. What's interesting is I've read this morning that the 50 may eventually be dynamically updated based on Technorati's monitoring of which blogs you link to most. The possiblities are endless when you have all the data -- which Technorati does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>50 blogs is about right for me. What&#8217;s interesting is I&#8217;ve read this morning that the 50 may eventually be dynamically updated based on Technorati&#8217;s monitoring of which blogs you link to most. The possiblities are endless when you have all the data &#8212; which Technorati does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kami Huyse, APR</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/02/will-you-sign-my-technorati-favorites-list.html/comment-page-1#comment-867</link>
		<dc:creator>Kami Huyse, APR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 15:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=686#comment-867</guid>
		<description>Scott; I have been busy this week and this new feature of Technorati slid under my radar, so thanks for the clue-in.  I knew I read your blog for a reason ;-0  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I think it is interesting that the favorites limits  you to 50 blogs, which pretty much rules it out of being a feed reader given some people *say* they actually read 200 blogs a day.  I myself don't have that kind of time.  I like that you can see the actual posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott; I have been busy this week and this new feature of Technorati slid under my radar, so thanks for the clue-in.  I knew I read your blog for a reason ;-0  </p>
<p>I think it is interesting that the favorites limits  you to 50 blogs, which pretty much rules it out of being a feed reader given some people *say* they actually read 200 blogs a day.  I myself don&#8217;t have that kind of time.  I like that you can see the actual posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/02/will-you-sign-my-technorati-favorites-list.html/comment-page-1#comment-866</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 15:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=686#comment-866</guid>
		<description>Scott,&lt;br/&gt;Guess you are right (of course), on two points:&lt;br/&gt;First, there must always be a way to rank things, blogs included. &lt;br/&gt;Second (and more important), since blogs are just the 'net version of word-of-mouth, the favorites of blogs one likes or of blogs that are popular does hold value for newbies and those looking for other good sources.&lt;br/&gt;Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott,<br />Guess you are right (of course), on two points:<br />First, there must always be a way to rank things, blogs included. <br />Second (and more important), since blogs are just the &#8216;net version of word-of-mouth, the favorites of blogs one likes or of blogs that are popular does hold value for newbies and those looking for other good sources.<br />Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SB</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/02/will-you-sign-my-technorati-favorites-list.html/comment-page-1#comment-865</link>
		<dc:creator>SB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 15:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=686#comment-865</guid>
		<description>Yes -- the feedreader business, absolutely. For anyone who's not sure yet: Technorati is the Google of blogging. They will control all. Invest now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes &#8212; the feedreader business, absolutely. For anyone who&#8217;s not sure yet: Technorati is the Google of blogging. They will control all. Invest now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/02/will-you-sign-my-technorati-favorites-list.html/comment-page-1#comment-864</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 15:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=686#comment-864</guid>
		<description>Doesn't this really mean that Techorati is getting in on the feed business?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t this really mean that Techorati is getting in on the feed business?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.898 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-02-09 12:16:57 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->