<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Media Orchard&#8217;s Popularity Plummets; Our Fans Suck</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/02/media-orchards-popularity-plummets-our-fans-suck.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/02/media-orchards-popularity-plummets-our-fans-suck.html</link>
	<description>Bringing You Media News, Marketing Views, Celebrity Culture &#38; Political Spin Since February 2005</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SB</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/02/media-orchards-popularity-plummets-our-fans-suck.html/comment-page-1#comment-893</link>
		<dc:creator>SB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 16:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=694#comment-893</guid>
		<description>The PubSub rankings do leave a lot to be desired. From what I can tell, it's currently the least useful of the ranking systems (and I believed this even when I was ranked #3!)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Not only Kami's example, but also blogs that have not even been in operation in ages, and yet rank higher than some pretty popular (and current) blogs on this list. It's very random.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Steven, I'm afraid you guys have some work -- or at least some serious splainin' -- to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The PubSub rankings do leave a lot to be desired. From what I can tell, it&#8217;s currently the least useful of the ranking systems (and I believed this even when I was ranked #3!)</p>
<p>Not only Kami&#8217;s example, but also blogs that have not even been in operation in ages, and yet rank higher than some pretty popular (and current) blogs on this list. It&#8217;s very random.</p>
<p>Steven, I&#8217;m afraid you guys have some work &#8212; or at least some serious splainin&#8217; &#8212; to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Hallett</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/02/media-orchards-popularity-plummets-our-fans-suck.html/comment-page-1#comment-892</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Hallett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=694#comment-892</guid>
		<description>It seems like that list is all over the place.   I remember one day I looked and I was #1 then a few days later I'm gone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like that list is all over the place.   I remember one day I looked and I was #1 then a few days later I&#8217;m gone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SB</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/02/media-orchards-popularity-plummets-our-fans-suck.html/comment-page-1#comment-880</link>
		<dc:creator>SB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 20:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=694#comment-880</guid>
		<description>I knew it!  I bet Cohen's baby is even involved...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I knew it!  I bet Cohen&#8217;s baby is even involved&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric E</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/02/media-orchards-popularity-plummets-our-fans-suck.html/comment-page-1#comment-879</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 20:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=694#comment-879</guid>
		<description>Scott, it's not your fans that are causing your popularity to plummet, it's a wide-ranging conspiracy among your peers, who view you with a mix of jealousy and adoration.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Our self-loathing causes us to sabotage your PubSub rankings through nefarious means you can't even begin to imagine.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I have other theories, but if I am not authorized to share them with you.  Rest assured.  You are not paranoid.  People are out to get you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott, it&#8217;s not your fans that are causing your popularity to plummet, it&#8217;s a wide-ranging conspiracy among your peers, who view you with a mix of jealousy and adoration.</p>
<p>Our self-loathing causes us to sabotage your PubSub rankings through nefarious means you can&#8217;t even begin to imagine.</p>
<p>I have other theories, but if I am not authorized to share them with you.  Rest assured.  You are not paranoid.  People are out to get you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/02/media-orchards-popularity-plummets-our-fans-suck.html/comment-page-1#comment-878</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 20:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=694#comment-878</guid>
		<description>Whew!  She gets me off the hook again.  Thanks baby!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whew!  She gets me off the hook again.  Thanks baby!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
