<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Media Orchard&#8217;s Popularity Plummets; Our Fans Suck</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/02/media-orchards-popularity-plummets-our-fans-suck.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/02/media-orchards-popularity-plummets-our-fans-suck.html</link>
	<description>The Idea Grove is a full-service agency specializing in public relations, marketing and Web design.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:07:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SB</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/02/media-orchards-popularity-plummets-our-fans-suck.html/comment-page-1#comment-893</link>
		<dc:creator>SB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 16:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=694#comment-893</guid>
		<description>The PubSub rankings do leave a lot to be desired. From what I can tell, it&#039;s currently the least useful of the ranking systems (and I believed this even when I was ranked #3!)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Not only Kami&#039;s example, but also blogs that have not even been in operation in ages, and yet rank higher than some pretty popular (and current) blogs on this list. It&#039;s very random.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Steven, I&#039;m afraid you guys have some work -- or at least some serious splainin&#039; -- to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The PubSub rankings do leave a lot to be desired. From what I can tell, it&#8217;s currently the least useful of the ranking systems (and I believed this even when I was ranked #3!)</p>
<p>Not only Kami&#8217;s example, but also blogs that have not even been in operation in ages, and yet rank higher than some pretty popular (and current) blogs on this list. It&#8217;s very random.</p>
<p>Steven, I&#8217;m afraid you guys have some work &#8212; or at least some serious splainin&#8217; &#8212; to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Hallett</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/02/media-orchards-popularity-plummets-our-fans-suck.html/comment-page-1#comment-892</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Hallett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=694#comment-892</guid>
		<description>It seems like that list is all over the place.   I remember one day I looked and I was #1 then a few days later I&#039;m gone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like that list is all over the place.   I remember one day I looked and I was #1 then a few days later I&#8217;m gone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SB</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/02/media-orchards-popularity-plummets-our-fans-suck.html/comment-page-1#comment-880</link>
		<dc:creator>SB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 20:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=694#comment-880</guid>
		<description>I knew it!  I bet Cohen&#039;s baby is even involved...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I knew it!  I bet Cohen&#8217;s baby is even involved&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric E</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/02/media-orchards-popularity-plummets-our-fans-suck.html/comment-page-1#comment-879</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 20:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=694#comment-879</guid>
		<description>Scott, it&#039;s not your fans that are causing your popularity to plummet, it&#039;s a wide-ranging conspiracy among your peers, who view you with a mix of jealousy and adoration.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Our self-loathing causes us to sabotage your PubSub rankings through nefarious means you can&#039;t even begin to imagine.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I have other theories, but if I am not authorized to share them with you.  Rest assured.  You are not paranoid.  People are out to get you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott, it&#8217;s not your fans that are causing your popularity to plummet, it&#8217;s a wide-ranging conspiracy among your peers, who view you with a mix of jealousy and adoration.</p>
<p>Our self-loathing causes us to sabotage your PubSub rankings through nefarious means you can&#8217;t even begin to imagine.</p>
<p>I have other theories, but if I am not authorized to share them with you.  Rest assured.  You are not paranoid.  People are out to get you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/02/media-orchards-popularity-plummets-our-fans-suck.html/comment-page-1#comment-878</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 20:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=694#comment-878</guid>
		<description>Whew!  She gets me off the hook again.  Thanks baby!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whew!  She gets me off the hook again.  Thanks baby!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

