<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Watch Out A-Listers: The Natives Are Restless</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/01/watch-out-a-listers-the-natives-are-restless.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/01/watch-out-a-listers-the-natives-are-restless.html</link>
	<description>Bringing You Media News, Marketing Views, Celebrity Culture &#38; Political Spin Since February 2005</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 06:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Howlett</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/01/watch-out-a-listers-the-natives-are-restless.html/comment-page-1#comment-756</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Howlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2006 10:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=630#comment-756</guid>
		<description>My anger - if that's the right word - is more about the fact so much of what matters to me is difficult to find. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I'm operating in a tough area yet I 'know' people want information on the things I talk around. Frustrating. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Tech me-me orandum is just that. And Jeremy is right. Circular = blogocircles. So you end up playing the game as Hugh describes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My anger - if that&#8217;s the right word - is more about the fact so much of what matters to me is difficult to find. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m operating in a tough area yet I &#8216;know&#8217; people want information on the things I talk around. Frustrating. </p>
<p>Tech me-me orandum is just that. And Jeremy is right. Circular = blogocircles. So you end up playing the game as Hugh describes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SB</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/01/watch-out-a-listers-the-natives-are-restless.html/comment-page-1#comment-728</link>
		<dc:creator>SB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 13:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=630#comment-728</guid>
		<description>Jeremy -- or is that "Mr. Pepper" now?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I think that in the end, the more clubby, arrogant A-listers will find that it hurts their links, traffic and, ultimately, influence.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;As I pointed out on Shel Israel's blog, the fact that Shel has reached out to new bloggers like Kami Huyse speaks well of him; it creates fans rather than merely subscribers, just as brands should seek to create fans rather than merely customers.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;So maybe Shel is not the best example. But anyone who doesn't think the problem exists, in a general sense, is kidding themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremy &#8212; or is that &#8220;Mr. Pepper&#8221; now?</p>
<p>I think that in the end, the more clubby, arrogant A-listers will find that it hurts their links, traffic and, ultimately, influence.</p>
<p>As I pointed out on Shel Israel&#8217;s blog, the fact that Shel has reached out to new bloggers like Kami Huyse speaks well of him; it creates fans rather than merely subscribers, just as brands should seek to create fans rather than merely customers.</p>
<p>So maybe Shel is not the best example. But anyone who doesn&#8217;t think the problem exists, in a general sense, is kidding themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/01/watch-out-a-listers-the-natives-are-restless.html/comment-page-1#comment-727</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 07:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=630#comment-727</guid>
		<description>You raise valid points - which I am sure will be immediately pooh-poohed as someone that doesn't know any better because you haven't been blogging long enough, or you dont have the links, or you don't kiss enough butt.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;All blogging is circular, but that doesn't mean that everytime a company launches a blog, everyone should jump and attack it. If McDonald's hired one of those experts for consulting, would it then be okay?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You raise valid points - which I am sure will be immediately pooh-poohed as someone that doesn&#8217;t know any better because you haven&#8217;t been blogging long enough, or you dont have the links, or you don&#8217;t kiss enough butt.</p>
<p>All blogging is circular, but that doesn&#8217;t mean that everytime a company launches a blog, everyone should jump and attack it. If McDonald&#8217;s hired one of those experts for consulting, would it then be okay?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SB</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/01/watch-out-a-listers-the-natives-are-restless.html/comment-page-1#comment-725</link>
		<dc:creator>SB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 20:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=630#comment-725</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Mike. And beyond your own blog, which I read, I also like that I find your comments on a number of PR blogs.  To me that's what this whole conversation thing is all about. It's a big part of what makes it fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Mike. And beyond your own blog, which I read, I also like that I find your comments on a number of PR blogs.  To me that&#8217;s what this whole conversation thing is all about. It&#8217;s a big part of what makes it fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2006/01/watch-out-a-listers-the-natives-are-restless.html/comment-page-1#comment-724</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=630#comment-724</guid>
		<description>Okay, so my traditional media analogy wasn't all that on target. Maybe it should've been the Washington Post ragging on the New York Times. Both are national.&lt;br/&gt;Now, I do know there is competition between NYT and the WSJ (more so from NYT's POV. At least according to my experience.).&lt;br/&gt;As fluid as blogging is, traffic and all things related are precious. What will drive traffic is regular blogging -- on worthwhile topics. &lt;br/&gt;Just like what you do, Scott.&lt;br/&gt;Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, so my traditional media analogy wasn&#8217;t all that on target. Maybe it should&#8217;ve been the Washington Post ragging on the New York Times. Both are national.<br />Now, I do know there is competition between NYT and the WSJ (more so from NYT&#8217;s POV. At least according to my experience.).<br />As fluid as blogging is, traffic and all things related are precious. What will drive traffic is regular blogging &#8212; on worthwhile topics. <br />Just like what you do, Scott.<br />Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
