Last updated by at .

January 25, 2006 in B2B PR, Media Orchard, Media Relations by Scott Baradell
We Are Delighted to Report That CEO Communications Have Become Significantly More Candid and Conversational in an Effort to Better Serve You — NOT

Steve Crescenzo, whom Shel Holtz calls “the ultimate critic of crummy CEO and president columns,” now thinks CEO communication has turned a corner:

It may be my imagination, but I think CEO Columns-R-Us may be going out of business. I’m seeing more and more CEO columns — both in print and online — that are willing to deal with real issues. I’m seeing CEOs tackle bad news head-on. I’ve actually seen a couple of CEO blogs that are conversational — rather than “corporate” — in tone.

Right — a couple. Hey, we’d like to think the author of the Corporate Hallucinations blog is not merely hallucinating, so we did a quick tour to find some CEO communications on the Web.

First, our methodology: We entered the term “CEO letter” in Google, and pulled excerpts from the first five letters that came back in the search results.

Here are those excerpts –

1. FEI Company.

While 2004 was a year of great accomplishments for FEI Company, we believe it is just a milestone in our growth as a leader in tools for nanotechnology. We are at the dawn of the nanotechnology era, and we are excited about our expanding array of opportunities in this globally competitive arena … FEI’s industry-leading tools are advancing nanotechnology across a range of markets. We are focused on the opportunities that come with our leadership, for the benefit of the industry and our shareholders.

2. Genworth Financial.

At Genworth Financial, one of our core values is performance. But to us, it’s more than just performance. It’s performance with integrity … While each of us as individuals make ethical decisions, we share a collective responsibility to infuse integrity in all aspects of our business. That’s why our reputation for honest and reliable business conduct is tested and proven in each transaction we make … I encourage you to take a moment to review our integrity policy. Should you have any questions, please contact our Ombudsperson at 1-888-251-4332.

3. Perficient.

Welcome to Perficient, the leading independent information technology consulting firm in the central United States. At Perficient, we run our business by three simple rules:
(1) deliver world-class solutions for our clients, (2)provide great careers for our colleagues, and (3) build meaningful value for our shareholders. These principles (and a lot of hard work) have enabled Perficient to scale in just six years from startup to a $110 million revenue market leader … The best news is we’re just getting started.

4. Winstead.

Our commitment to having the best people and to providing the best service is not only our promise to our clients – it is a promise we make to ourselves … For the past 30 years, we have defined our success by our ability to impact the success of our clients. Our clients will always be a top priority. We value the professionalism, experience and knowledge that each Winstead team member brings to the firm, and we pride ourselves in maintaining a reputation that is collegial, team-oriented and, most importantly, results-driven.

5. AAR.

At AAR, our goal is to be your preferred aerospace/aviation logistics and value-added products and services provider. To meet this goal, every member of our team is dedicated to the principle of applying creative thinking to your everyday support requirements. We constantly challenge ourselves to develop new capabilities, along with innovative products and programs that can help you improve performance and increase profitability. We are confident that by working together with AAR your goals of operational excellence and cost efficiency can become a reality.

OK, that’s the first five. Do you want to see five more?

We’ve been writing CEO letters for 13 years, so we know how hard it is to escape the easy trap of overused corporate language. And while a small number of CEOs are breaking out and taking more chances (this guy has always done it best), there is much more work to be done.

As for you, Steve: Go back to hallucinating. Do they have a 12-step program for that? Dallas Marketing and Dallas Web Design picture of icon smile

Technorati tags: , , ,

GD Star Rating
loading...
 
1
January 25, 2006 in Media Orchard, Picks by Scott Baradell
Pick of the Orchard 1.25.06
  • If you work in advertising you should read all your spam (Shel Holtz)
  • Wither Goes the Wire Services (Jeremy Pepper)
  • Press Release About the Widely Speculated Demise of the Press Release (Kami Huyse)
  • Sticks and Stones (The Flack)
  • BlackBerry Did Not Pick the Low Hanging Fruit (Think)
  • A Meaty New Blog (Holmes Report Blog)
  • Wake up goo (clogger)
  • A Transparent Paycheck [follow-up post] (Core Issues)

    Technorati tags: , , , , , , ,

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  •  
    0
    January 24, 2006 in Media Orchard, Social Media Marketing by Scott Baradell
    Vote for Jeremy

    Dallas Marketing and Dallas Web Design picture of tanks 762656
    Adland’s “Battle of the Ad Blogs,” where “a posse of adgrunts have sifted through the ever growing pile of ad blogs to find the gems and pit them against each other” in a popular vote, is in full swing. It includes a PR category.

    Let’s go ahead and chew on our sour grapes first: The nominations seem a tad arbitrary. Maybe next year, the guys at Adland could at least open up the voting to more than five of the 300 PR blogs out there; that way the people (rather than the mysterious Adland cabal) can decide the “popular” favorites.

    Nevertheless, the five nominees are all worthy candidates: Jeremy Pepper, B.L. Ochman, John Cass, Trevor Cook and Tom Murphy. Currently, Jeremy has a slight edge over B.L. in the voting.

    Media Orchard hereby officially endorses Jeremy, and we encourage you to cast your ballot for POP! PR Jots.

    Why an endorsement? And why Jeremy?

    Jeremy was the first popular PR blogger to take an interest in Media Orchard. He’s been a regular commenter since close to the beginning, and he’s always been generous in offering advice and suggestions. He also doesn’t mind telling us when he thinks we’ve screwed up — by promoting our blog a little too shamelessly, seeking referrals a little too aggressively, or otherwise not meeting his exacting standards for blog integrity.

    Yes, we’re kind of teasing Jeremy — in addition to ourselves — when we say all this. But we’re dead serious about one thing: PR bloggers won’t find a better compass for personal and professional integrity than Jeremy. He cares very deeply about the practice of public relations, and he demonstrates this again and again.

    That’s why we voted for him. And why you should, too.

    By the way, Steve Rubel was not nominated in the PR category but was nominated in the Marketing and Online/Interactive categories. We voted for Steve — even though he has not responded (as yet) to our e-mail requesting that he say something about the Dr. Myra fraud on behalf of public relations practitioners everywhere.

    We also voted for our friend Hans Kullin for Best Non-English Language Ad Blog. Oh, and for Random Culture for Best Inspiration Blog.

    Voting ends February 10, but don’t wait.

    Technorati tags: , , ,

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
     
    8
    January 24, 2006 in Media Orchard, Media Relations, PR Agencies, Technology PR by Scott Baradell
    PRSA’s News Monitoring Service Should Include Blogs

    Dallas Marketing and Dallas Web Design picture of prsa 759032
    Like PRSA members across the country, Media Orchard regularly receives “PR Issues and Trends” in our inbox. From the e-mail:

    PR Issues and Trends is a daily news monitoring service brought to you by the PRSA, its Advocacy Committee and the Professional Resource Center. This service reports on industry trends, advocacy and other issues impacting the profession and the professional. PRSA’s Professional Resources staff reviews dozens of news, business, trade publications and Web sites, handpicking the most relevant stories of the day.

    While useful, PR Issues and Trends has yet to incorporate blogs among its news sources. We think it’s time they did.

    If you agree, e-mail your opinion to the PRSA’s Professional Resource Center at resources@prsa.org.

    Technorati tags: , ,

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
     
    5
    January 24, 2006 in Media, Media Orchard, Media Relations by Scott Baradell
    Dr. Myra Defends McKinney’s Fake Wikipedia Entry

    Dallas Marketing and Dallas Web Design picture of pherotones 711898
    Bruce Stewart of O’Reilly posted an IM interview last night with fictional blogger Dr. Myra, a creation of the Durham, N.C. ad firm McKinney. McKinney has created a fake Wikipedia entry, among other tactics, as part of its current stealth “Pherotones” campaign.

    Said Bruce:

    I definitely agree with most critics that [McKinney] went too far when they tried to pollute the Wikipedia with a bogus pherotone entry. C’mon guys, the Wikipedia is having enough trouble with mainstream public perception lately, it really doesn’t need ad folks trying to manipulate entries too.

    So Bruce asked Dr. Myra about it. The exchange:

    DrPherotone: Hi. How are you today?
    bruceETel: doing well, thanks! What’s going on with the wikipedia entry for pherotones, do you know? did you write that entry?
    DrPherotone: Well, when you consider the groupthink that rules
    mainstream “acceptable” science, it’s surprising they let it stay up for even one minute.
    DrPherotone: No, but it is based on a lot of my work.
    bruceETel: Are you going to try and fight to keep it up?
    DrPherotone: You can’t fight city hall. The only way to keep it up there is to prove once and for all the existence and potency of Pherotones. That’s the only fight I am interested in.
    bruceETel: Are you working for McKinney Silver?
    DrPherotone: No, they work for me.

    Anyone who reads Media Orchard knows we have a sense of humor. So please indulge us for a moment as we go back into “curmudgeon” mode.

    Look, McKinney’s campaign has worked — no question. It’s achieved a good measure of blog buzz, and, negative or positive, McKinney clearly could care less. It’s a win for them.

    So, we now must ask this:

    Are we prepared for the day when hundreds of other advertising firms — large and small, hip and not hip, ones who “get it” and ones who don’t — are making up “facts” and posting it on Wikipedia, and making the whole bloggy world like a chat room where a 14-year-old girl always has to wonder if she’s chatting with a 50-year-old man who’s just pretending to be a 14-year-old boy?

    We know: very curmudgeonly of us.

    But we do wonder.

    Update: Looks like McKinney has toned down the Wikipedia entry, although the firm is still not coming clean. Half-measures don’t cut it, gang; just pull it, apologize and move on.

    Technorati tags: , , ,

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
     
    5