Crisis Communications Tip: When a 5-Year-Old Gets Drunk at Your Restaurant, Don’t Say "No Comment"

Dallas Marketing and Dallas Web Design picture of applebeeskid 791544
“Mom Sues After 5-Year-Old Allegedly Served Long Island Iced Tea”

A mother in New York is suing an Applebee’s restaurant after her 5-year-old son was allegedly served a Long Island Iced Tea instead of apple juice. Cynthia Pereles said she took her son Seth to dinner at the franchised restaurant in Battery Park City and ordered him an apple juice.

Pereles said she did not realize her son was drinking a concoction of white rum, gin, vodka, triple sec, Coke and sweet-and-sour mix until it was too late. The boy’s eyes became glazed and he began to laugh uncontrollably, according to a report.

“When you’re looking at your 5-year-old and you’re asking him, quiet down Seth, sit still and you see that mentally and physically he cannot comply with what you’re asking him to do because he is under the influence,” Pereles said.

The boy was taken to the hospital and doctors found alcohol in the child’s blood. Pereles said the restaurant admitted the mistake but she is still suing for $75,000.

A manager at the restaurant declined comment.

“Declined comment” is almost never good.

Neither is “no comment was all we got,” which is how WCBS-TV reported Applebee’s reaction. The WCBS reporter added “they told us to contact corporate headquarters here in New York. We tried, but they haven’t returned numerous phone calls.”

The New York Post was only told by Applebee’s International that the chain “had not seen the legal papers yet.”

When are companies going to learn? Even in a case of pending litigation, Applebee’s doesn’t have to “no comment” — no matter what a cautious corporate attorney who is clueless about PR might advise.

It should have:

1. Stated its position on the incident (whether it did or did not serve the child alcohol.)
2. Expressed regret and said that its first concern has been for the well-being of the child (if it did, indeed, serve the child alcohol.)

How hard is that?

(Photo by Julie Stapen of the New York Post. Link via Boing Boing.)

Technorati tags: , ,

GD Star Rating
loading...
Dallas Marketing and Dallas Web Design picture of pixel

Tags: , ,

6 Comments
Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

"Eatin' good in the neighbourhood" indeed. You'd think a chain of that size would have a more constructive way of dealing with an in-restaurant incident of this magnitude.At least I'll have another "what not to do" case study for future media training sessions.

I agree completely Scott. I worked for a trade association with state offices. We came up with a crisis communication training program to prepare people at the local level to respond to a crisis on the scene.We also returned phone calls from the press. This is was a "bad apple" all the way down the line.I hope they have to pay the $75,000, maybe they will return calls next time.

RE: "Have you ever worked at a major chain like that?" Yes, I have; I was VP of corporate communications for a wireless communications company that had 90 offices, and such crises occurred often. That's why we trained our local managers to handle such situations -- with our guidance and counsel, of course.I should be clear that I don't blame the folks at the individual restaurant; they were obviously instructed to refer reporters to corporate.However, the corporate office should have responded.For future crises, the corporate office would be better off if it gave media training to location managers, and then, when a crisis occurred, provided them with vetted statements/talking points for handling media calls.

Have you ever worked at a major chain like that? No one working in a local store is EVER allowed to talk to the press about anything. It's always "no comment' and a referral to the higher ups. If that manager had said one word - they would have been fired no questions asked. And since we don't know if the manager they tried to talk to was the one on duty when the incident happened, I know if it was me I wouldn't want to get fired by commenting on someone else's mistake.

"When you're looking at your 5-year-old and you're asking him, quiet down Seth, sit still and you see that mentally and physically he cannot comply with what you're asking him to do because he is under the influence," Pereles said.Yeah... when that happens, WHAT?? FINISH THE SENTENCE!!

Note to CEOs: If you're not going to have a PR person on your staff whose counsel you trust, at least take a PR 101 class so you'll know the basics. Sheesh.