
“Mom Sues After 5-Year-Old Allegedly Served Long Island Iced Tea” –
A mother in New York is suing an Applebee’s restaurant after her 5-year-old son was allegedly served a Long Island Iced Tea instead of apple juice. Cynthia Pereles said she took her son Seth to dinner at the franchised restaurant in Battery Park City and ordered him an apple juice.Pereles said she did not realize her son was drinking a concoction of white rum, gin, vodka, triple sec, Coke and sweet-and-sour mix until it was too late. The boy’s eyes became glazed and he began to laugh uncontrollably, according to a report.
“When you’re looking at your 5-year-old and you’re asking him, quiet down Seth, sit still and you see that mentally and physically he cannot comply with what you’re asking him to do because he is under the influence,” Pereles said.
The boy was taken to the hospital and doctors found alcohol in the child’s blood. Pereles said the restaurant admitted the mistake but she is still suing for $75,000.
A manager at the restaurant declined comment.
“Declined comment” is almost never good.
Neither is “no comment was all we got,” which is how WCBS-TV reported Applebee’s reaction. The WCBS reporter added “they told us to contact corporate headquarters here in New York. We tried, but they haven’t returned numerous phone calls.”
The New York Post was only told by Applebee’s International that the chain “had not seen the legal papers yet.”
When are companies going to learn? Even in a case of pending litigation, Applebee’s doesn’t have to “no comment” — no matter what a cautious corporate attorney who is clueless about PR might advise.
It should have:
1. Stated its position on the incident (whether it did or did not serve the child alcohol.)
2. Expressed regret and said that its first concern has been for the well-being of the child (if it did, indeed, serve the child alcohol.)
How hard is that?
(Photo by Julie Stapen of the New York Post. Link via Boing Boing.)
Technorati tags: PR, Public Relations, Applebee’s
loading...
"Eatin' good in the neighbourhood" indeed. You'd think a chain of that size would have a more constructive way of dealing with an in-restaurant incident of this magnitude.At least I'll have another "what not to do" case study for future media training sessions.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like