<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who&#8217;s Stupider &#8212; Ann Coulter or CNN?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2005/12/whos-stupider-ann-coulter-or-cnn.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2005/12/whos-stupider-ann-coulter-or-cnn.html</link>
	<description>Bringing You Media News, Marketing Views, Celebrity Culture &#38; Political Spin Since February 2005</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 16:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2005/12/whos-stupider-ann-coulter-or-cnn.html/comment-page-1#comment-2404</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 04:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=440#comment-2404</guid>
		<description>Of course, "stupider" is a word.  An adjective of one or two syllables forms its comparative with the suffix "er," just as it forms its superlative with the suffix"est": thus warmer and warmest rather than more warm and most warm; sillier and silliest; stupider and stupidest. In this dispute, though, no comparative is necessary, since CNN is the only stupid one here, whereas Ann Coulter, once again, has  shown herself to be just the opposite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, &#8220;stupider&#8221; is a word.  An adjective of one or two syllables forms its comparative with the suffix &#8220;er,&#8221; just as it forms its superlative with the suffix&#8221;est&#8221;: thus warmer and warmest rather than more warm and most warm; sillier and silliest; stupider and stupidest. In this dispute, though, no comparative is necessary, since CNN is the only stupid one here, whereas Ann Coulter, once again, has  shown herself to be just the opposite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SB</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2005/12/whos-stupider-ann-coulter-or-cnn.html/comment-page-1#comment-2282</link>
		<dc:creator>SB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 19:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=440#comment-2282</guid>
		<description>She's objectively brutal, but not objectively truthful. So you can only support her if your subjective support of her opinions blinds you to everything else -- which is a little sad, frankly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She&#8217;s objectively brutal, but not objectively truthful. So you can only support her if your subjective support of her opinions blinds you to everything else &#8212; which is a little sad, frankly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robb</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2005/12/whos-stupider-ann-coulter-or-cnn.html/comment-page-1#comment-2281</link>
		<dc:creator>Robb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 18:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=440#comment-2281</guid>
		<description>Ann Coulter is a hottie and great at telling the brutal truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ann Coulter is a hottie and great at telling the brutal truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SB</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2005/12/whos-stupider-ann-coulter-or-cnn.html/comment-page-1#comment-2279</link>
		<dc:creator>SB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 10:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=440#comment-2279</guid>
		<description>Dude, that was the wording of the CNN poll question.  Click a link or two before you fire off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude, that was the wording of the CNN poll question.  Click a link or two before you fire off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaz</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2005/12/whos-stupider-ann-coulter-or-cnn.html/comment-page-1#comment-2278</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 06:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=440#comment-2278</guid>
		<description>So you're saying that Ann Coulter and CNN are stunned?&lt;br/&gt;I have a feeling that you should have said, "Who is &lt;i&gt;more&lt;/i&gt; stupid, Anne Coulter or CNN?"&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Just because "stupider" may exist as an obscure word does not mean that you used it correctly.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Despite the disclaimer, it seems to me that the author of this post is the true dolt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you&#8217;re saying that Ann Coulter and CNN are stunned?<br />I have a feeling that you should have said, &#8220;Who is <i>more</i> stupid, Anne Coulter or CNN?&#8221;</p>
<p>Just because &#8220;stupider&#8221; may exist as an obscure word does not mean that you used it correctly.</p>
<p>Despite the disclaimer, it seems to me that the author of this post is the true dolt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.395 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-02-04 11:16:00 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->