<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Starbucks Marketing Stunt: We Give It a Thumbs Up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2005/12/starbucks-marketing-stunt-we-give-it-a-thumbs-up.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2005/12/starbucks-marketing-stunt-we-give-it-a-thumbs-up.html</link>
	<description>Bringing You Media News, Marketing Views, Celebrity Culture &#38; Political Spin Since February 2005</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 09:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim Jackson- Masi Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2005/12/starbucks-marketing-stunt-we-give-it-a-thumbs-up.html/comment-page-1#comment-375</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Jackson- Masi Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 17:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=436#comment-375</guid>
		<description>I think they nailed it on this one. How very, very clever... as a bunch of people are likely mumbling- I only wish I'd thought of it first. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Adding the coupon for a free coffee just seals the deal. They are likely able to convert non-Starbucks drinkers into advocates. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;How this could be a bad thing is beyond me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they nailed it on this one. How very, very clever&#8230; as a bunch of people are likely mumbling- I only wish I&#8217;d thought of it first. </p>
<p>Adding the coupon for a free coffee just seals the deal. They are likely able to convert non-Starbucks drinkers into advocates. </p>
<p>How this could be a bad thing is beyond me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SB</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2005/12/starbucks-marketing-stunt-we-give-it-a-thumbs-up.html/comment-page-1#comment-373</link>
		<dc:creator>SB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 14:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=436#comment-373</guid>
		<description>Piers, what I like about it is that whoever has a Thomas Hawk experience will inevitably tell the story to -- oh -- EVERYONE they know.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;And, as I recall, the Starbucks brand mantra is "rewarding everyday moments." &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Getting a fun story to tell your friends and a coupon for free coffee to boot -- sounds like a "rewarding everyday moment" to me...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Piers, what I like about it is that whoever has a Thomas Hawk experience will inevitably tell the story to &#8212; oh &#8212; EVERYONE they know.</p>
<p>And, as I recall, the Starbucks brand mantra is &#8220;rewarding everyday moments.&#8221; </p>
<p>Getting a fun story to tell your friends and a coupon for free coffee to boot &#8212; sounds like a &#8220;rewarding everyday moment&#8221; to me&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Piers Fawkes</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2005/12/starbucks-marketing-stunt-we-give-it-a-thumbs-up.html/comment-page-1#comment-370</link>
		<dc:creator>Piers Fawkes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 04:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=436#comment-370</guid>
		<description>It's an appalling piece of marketing. Here's why:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;a) Does an omnipresent brand like Starbucks need to conduct the sort of stunt that is more apt for a new brand.&lt;br/&gt;b) It makes me think of what the guys on the &lt;a HREF="http://americancopywriter.typepad.com/" REL="nofollow"&gt;American  Copywriter&lt;/a&gt; podcast said about the payoff: there isn't any here. Starbucks created a situation, made someone feel a fool and then... erm, they wished them Happy Holidays. Is that really a 'pay off' or just a bad marketing idea?&lt;br/&gt;c) Someone convince me that this campaign falls inside the Starbucks brand guidelines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s an appalling piece of marketing. Here&#8217;s why:</p>
<p>a) Does an omnipresent brand like Starbucks need to conduct the sort of stunt that is more apt for a new brand.<br />b) It makes me think of what the guys on the <a HREF="http://americancopywriter.typepad.com/" REL="nofollow">American  Copywriter</a> podcast said about the payoff: there isn&#8217;t any here. Starbucks created a situation, made someone feel a fool and then&#8230; erm, they wished them Happy Holidays. Is that really a &#8216;pay off&#8217; or just a bad marketing idea?<br />c) Someone convince me that this campaign falls inside the Starbucks brand guidelines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
