<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pick Your Favorite (and Least Favorite) Web 2.0 Logo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2005/12/pick-your-favorite-and-least-favorite-web-20-logo.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2005/12/pick-your-favorite-and-least-favorite-web-20-logo.html</link>
	<description>Bringing You Media News, Marketing Views, Celebrity Culture &#38; Political Spin Since February 2005</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 03:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brandon Burley</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2005/12/pick-your-favorite-and-least-favorite-web-20-logo.html/comment-page-1#comment-2499</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon Burley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 01:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=434#comment-2499</guid>
		<description>I like Technorati's logo. I loathe blogads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Technorati&#8217;s logo. I loathe blogads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SB</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2005/12/pick-your-favorite-and-least-favorite-web-20-logo.html/comment-page-1#comment-429</link>
		<dc:creator>SB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 23:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=434#comment-429</guid>
		<description>Well, looks like Technorati is the unanimous winner. If anyone has a good write-in candidate to suggest (in addition to 37signals), I may hold a second contest later with Technorati as the defending champ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, looks like Technorati is the unanimous winner. If anyone has a good write-in candidate to suggest (in addition to 37signals), I may hold a second contest later with Technorati as the defending champ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Wagner</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2005/12/pick-your-favorite-and-least-favorite-web-20-logo.html/comment-page-1#comment-385</link>
		<dc:creator>John Wagner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 23:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=434#comment-385</guid>
		<description>Oh, and as Daniel said earlier, I really like the Backpack logo from 37signals.  Simple, clean and easy to understand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and as Daniel said earlier, I really like the Backpack logo from 37signals.  Simple, clean and easy to understand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Wagner</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2005/12/pick-your-favorite-and-least-favorite-web-20-logo.html/comment-page-1#comment-384</link>
		<dc:creator>John Wagner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 23:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=434#comment-384</guid>
		<description>Upon further review ...&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Squidoo is certainly eye-catching, and I see that the squid has a "lens," which ties into the business, so I give it a thumbs up.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;BlogAds is the worst and even the new version you posted is scary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Upon further review &#8230;</p>
<p>Squidoo is certainly eye-catching, and I see that the squid has a &#8220;lens,&#8221; which ties into the business, so I give it a thumbs up.</p>
<p>BlogAds is the worst and even the new version you posted is scary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SB</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2005/12/pick-your-favorite-and-least-favorite-web-20-logo.html/comment-page-1#comment-382</link>
		<dc:creator>SB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 20:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=434#comment-382</guid>
		<description>OK, I'll go ahead and give my two-bit take on each of these logos, since I've been asked:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Socialtext: Reminds me of Chinese checkers; too complicated.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;AdBrite: Going for old-school toothpaste branding; not memorable enough.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;BlogAds: Looks like the company is being held for ransom, and this is the note.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Technorati: Distinctive yet duly corporate interpretation of the talk bubble. Love it. (And we at Idea Grove are partial to black and green.)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Squiddo: Looks like a child's toy. Too literal an interpretation of the name.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;BlogHer: The icon doesn't say anything.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;FeedBurner: My second favorite. I give the nod to Technorati because its icon evokes what the company &lt;i&gt;does&lt;/i&gt;, whereas FeedBurner's only evokes the company name.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;NewsGator: Maybe I'm dumb, but I don't really get the icon. Can someone explain it to me? In general, I would say that arrows pointing downward are not good for business.   &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Pajamas Media: I love this company, and I want them to be successful.  But this logo is&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;(1) too literal&lt;br/&gt;(2) not even pajamas, but a robe&lt;br/&gt;(3) a radioactive robe, at that&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Sorry, guys.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Now accepting opposing viewpoints...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I&#8217;ll go ahead and give my two-bit take on each of these logos, since I&#8217;ve been asked:</p>
<p>Socialtext: Reminds me of Chinese checkers; too complicated.</p>
<p>AdBrite: Going for old-school toothpaste branding; not memorable enough.</p>
<p>BlogAds: Looks like the company is being held for ransom, and this is the note.</p>
<p>Technorati: Distinctive yet duly corporate interpretation of the talk bubble. Love it. (And we at Idea Grove are partial to black and green.)</p>
<p>Squiddo: Looks like a child&#8217;s toy. Too literal an interpretation of the name.</p>
<p>BlogHer: The icon doesn&#8217;t say anything.</p>
<p>FeedBurner: My second favorite. I give the nod to Technorati because its icon evokes what the company <i>does</i>, whereas FeedBurner&#8217;s only evokes the company name.</p>
<p>NewsGator: Maybe I&#8217;m dumb, but I don&#8217;t really get the icon. Can someone explain it to me? In general, I would say that arrows pointing downward are not good for business.   </p>
<p>Pajamas Media: I love this company, and I want them to be successful.  But this logo is</p>
<p>(1) too literal<br />(2) not even pajamas, but a robe<br />(3) a radioactive robe, at that</p>
<p>Sorry, guys.</p>
<p>Now accepting opposing viewpoints&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
