As the Web 2.0 boomlet continues, we’re seeing more and more startups — which means more and more company logos.
Some of these logos are great. Others are remarkably amateurish. In general, they remind me of Web 1.0 logos created without the Web 1.0 budget. And that’s good; it indicates that these companies are focusing their resources on creating real businesses — not buying Super Bowl ads.
Still, a little healthy competition is a good thing.
I’ve posted several logos of Web 2.0 companies. I’d like you to tell me, in comments, which one you like best and/or which one you like least. If you want to go all Rorschach on me and tell me what you think the logo “means,” feel free to do that, too.
Please: don’t be shy. Vote.
OK, I’ll start things off. I love Technorati’s logo; Squidoo’s — not so much.
Update: I’ve belatedly added the Pajamas Media logo to the competition. It actually looks like a radioactive robe to me … but I love those guys, anyway.
Also, at the request of John Zeratsky of Feedburner, I’ve replaced the logo I pulled from their site with a better version.
Technorati tags: Web 2.0, PR, Branding, Marketing, Squidoo, Technorati, Feedburner, Blogads, AdBrite, BlogHer, Socialtext, NewsGator, Pajamas Media
loading...








I like Technorati's logo. I loathe blogads.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like