In February 1968, CBS Evening News anchor Walter Cronkite gave the commentary that many believe turned the tide of public sentiment on the Vietnam War. He said, among other things:
We have been too often disappointed by the optimism of the American leaders, both in Vietnam and Washington, to have faith any longer in the silver linings they find in the darkest clouds … For it seems now more certain than ever that the bloody experience of Vietnam is to end in a stalemate.
I don’t want to get into an argument over the current war in Iraq; I do think it’s fair to say the insurgency is not in its “last throes,” by every reasonable estimation.
I don’t want to get into an argument over the Vietnam War, either; I know there are many people who believe Cronkite, Jane Fonda and other anti-war types undermined the U.S. military and caused us to lose a war we could have won.
My question to you is this:
Does any U.S. journalist have the courage to take a stance on Iraq similar to Cronkite’s on Vietnam — and the credibility to have anything approaching Cronkite’s impact?
Offhand, I can’t think of one. The journalists who have the most universal appeal in today’s polarized media world — Tim Russert, Tom Brokaw, and who else? — wouldn’t do it. And if they did, they’d be immediately and forcefully lumped in with other “liberal” journalists, both avowed and alleged.
The media war would continue as it had before. The impact would be minimal, if not nonexistent.
What do you think?
Technorati tags: Journalism, Iraq, Vietnam, Media, Walter Cronkite, Tim Russert
loading...
Tags: dallas marketing, dallas pr, dallas public relations, seo dallas, vietnam, walter cronkite
It's a different world today. The only person I can think of would be someone like Oprah -- if she used the platform of her show to preach against the war every day, it would make a difference.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like