November 11, 2005 in Media, Media Orchard, Politics by Scott Baradell

The Thrilla in Billa: Mapes vs. O’Reilly

Dallas Marketing and Dallas Web Design picture of mapes 724191
Mary Mapes’ appearance on The O’Reilly Factor last night — “The Thrilla in Billa” — was highlighted by Mapes’ bobbing and weaving when the host questioned her political affiliation.

O’Reilly: Now the right wing thinks you’re a raving liberal, you and Rather contrived to put Bush in the worst possible light. That’s what the right, far right believes.

Mapes: When they’re at their nicest, that’s what they say.

O’Reilly: All right. So are you a liberal?

Mapes: Well, I’m not sure what a liberal is. I’m more liberal than some people. I can tell you my eight-year-old son thinks he’s being raised by the most conservative parents in the world.

O’Reilly: No, but politically you know what I’m talking about.

Mapes: Well, I think like a lot of Americans, I’m all over the map and it’s something, I mean for me like who I vote for –

O’Reilly: Are you a registered Democrat?

Mapes: You know, I don’t know.

O’Reilly: You don’t know?

Mapes: I don’t know if I’m independent or Democrat. I know I’m not … in Texas, I’m not sure how I’m registered.

O’Reilly later accused Mapes of “dancing” in response to a question about Cindy Sheehan and explained to her with slight exasperation: “I’m just trying to define how you see the world.”

While conservative bloggers are shocked — shocked! — by Mapes’ cagey responses, they see no problem with O’Reilly claiming (far more incredibly) that he has no political affiliation.

He wrote in the O’Reilly Factor book:

You might be wondering whether I’m conservative, liberal, libertarian, or exactly what … I don’t want to fit any of those labels, because I believe that the truth doesn’t have labels. When I see corruption, I try to expose it. When I see exploitation, I try to fight it. That’s my political position.

But he was registered as a Republican for years, only dropping the affiliation when he learned The Washington Post was going to report this fact in 2000.

Pot, meet kettle. Kettle, pot.

But Mapes is on higher ground in this cage(y) match. Why? Because Mapes, as part of her job description, is asked to set aside her political leanings.

What’s O’Reilly’s excuse?

Update: Mapes discusses the O’Reilly interview and other topics in this Washington Post online chat.

Technorati tags: , , ,

GD Star Rating
loading...
Dallas Marketing and Dallas Web Design picture of pixel

Tags: , ,

2 Comments
Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

That's a low blow: comparing me to Bill O'Reilly.I obviously do have strong opinions, and when you start to look at the pattern of those opinions you can figure out leanings -- even in a blog that isn't directly about politics. I am trying (perhaps in vain) to keep this blog from being labeled politically, because labels tend to shut off people's minds. It's why cable TV news (both conservative Fox and "liberal" CNN) is so brainless.Some facts:* I have voted for Democrats, Republicans and third party candidates in my lifetime.* I supported Kerry in 2004, but I can think of a number of moderate Republicans I would vote for in 2008, depending on their opposition. In the current environment, however, I don't think a moderate can get the Republican nomination.* I think the damage to our political system caused by campaign finance has undermined the credibility of both parties.* The Fox News Channel and the war in Iraq both bother me a great deal, because both are based on political sleight-of-hand.* One of my central values is tolerance, which explains most of my differences with the far right.* On many issues, I am not sure if the "liberal" or "conservative" solution is better. For example, on the issue of children's exposure to sex and violence, I would like government to do something to regulate the media (liberal view), but based on what I've seen I think any government action would probably make things worse (conservative view.) * Although I do vote, I honestly believe there is no party for me (or for most Americans) at the moment. Wow. Never thought I'd write all this here. Hope it's clarifying.And, anonymous, feel free in the future to use your name (I won't be offended), and feel free to call me on any statements you believe are inconsistent. I post enough that I don't doubt that I may sometimes contradict myself.

you're guilty of the same thing. in a previous post you talk about how hard you try to be non-partisan, when in truth your commmentary is completely transparent and you're obviously liberal. i really hope you don't lack THAT much insight because i like your blog, but it's starting to irritate me because it's condescending to pretend your readers are so stupid they won't grasp it when your combination of content choices and your commentary make your leanings pretty clear. it does a disservice to liberals (like myself) who are dying for people just to be straight with them.