<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Blogger Code Is to Credit Your Sources; Some Journalists Should Take a Lesson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2005/11/the-blogger-code-is-to-credit-your-sources-some-journalists-should-take-a-lesson.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2005/11/the-blogger-code-is-to-credit-your-sources-some-journalists-should-take-a-lesson.html</link>
	<description>Bringing You Media News, Marketing Views, Celebrity Culture &#38; Political Spin Since February 2005</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SB</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2005/11/the-blogger-code-is-to-credit-your-sources-some-journalists-should-take-a-lesson.html/comment-page-1#comment-249</link>
		<dc:creator>SB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2005 23:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=301#comment-249</guid>
		<description>Yes, it's common for a national newspaper to ignore an alt weekly. But back in the days of two Dallas dailies, when I worked for the Times Herald, we also wouldn't acknowledge a scoop by the Morning News.  We'd just say "according to published reports."&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Can you imagine that tactic working in the blogosphere?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it&#8217;s common for a national newspaper to ignore an alt weekly. But back in the days of two Dallas dailies, when I worked for the Times Herald, we also wouldn&#8217;t acknowledge a scoop by the Morning News.  We&#8217;d just say &#8220;according to published reports.&#8221;</p>
<p>Can you imagine that tactic working in the blogosphere?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2005/11/the-blogger-code-is-to-credit-your-sources-some-journalists-should-take-a-lesson.html/comment-page-1#comment-248</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2005 22:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=301#comment-248</guid>
		<description>The Dallas Observer always has this same kind of problem with the Mroning News.  They are always writing about stories that they uncovered and that the Morning News writes about afterward without mentioning that they got the story from the observer. interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Dallas Observer always has this same kind of problem with the Mroning News.  They are always writing about stories that they uncovered and that the Morning News writes about afterward without mentioning that they got the story from the observer. interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
