November 27, 2005 in Media Orchard, PR and Pop Culture by sbaradell@ideagrove.com
How Never to Find a Job: the Barbara Ehrenreich Career Network


Media Orchard was on Barbara Ehrenreich’s Web site today (we’d heard she’d become a blogger), and we found it quite amusing that she’s now launching a “local career networking” campaign in association with her new book, Bait and Switch.

Barbara’s a talented writer, and we share her views on a number of issues. But Bait and Switch is a non-starter, as we explain in our post, “Barbara Ehrenreich Can’t Find a PR Job; Therefore, the Economy is Crumbling.”

For the book, Barbara assembled a fake resume documenting non-existent public relations experience; then, she spent months searching (unsuccessfully) for a PR job in the $60-100K range. She concludes that the white-collar middle-class has been sold a bill of goods, and that because of downsizing we’ll soon all be working at Wal-Mart for $8 per hour.

The reality is that most fakers can be smoked out in a job interview. In fact, Barbara’s whole search process is pretty laughable. As The Christian Science Monitor puts it:

Is it any wonder that she can’t find someone to hire her? Ehrenreich can’t turn to a large network of former clients for job leads because her imaginary PR consultant doesn’t really exist. In another potentially fatal flaw, it takes her forever to realize that it might be a good idea to hobnob with actual PR people instead of a hodgepodge of the jobless.

Most amazing of all is Ehrenreich’s naivete about the job market. She’s surprised that white-collar workers massage the truth out of their resumes, that they focus intensely on what they wear, that they must deal with bosses who care more about people skills than job skills. She’s even taken aback when someone suggests she delete the date of her college graduation from her resume so she won’t come across as too old.

This stranger-in-a-strange-land attitude wears thin, especially coming from someone who should be more aware. Where has she been?

So now — after failing miserably to find a job, even with the benefit of a falsified resume — Barbara’s going to organize “grassroots support groups” for job seekers?

Isn’t that kind of like O.J. conducting anger management workshops?

Technorati tags: , , ,

 
2
November 27, 2005 in Media, Media Orchard by sbaradell@ideagrove.com
"Intelligent Design, Creationism and Other Religious Mythologies"

That’s the title of a new course that will be offered at the University of Kansas next semester — and intelligent-design advocates are fuming.

Unfortunately, the person quoted first in the Kansas City Star’s story on the controversy is Bruce Simat, an intelligent-design supporter and associate biology professor at Minnesota’s Northwestern College. The Star fails to point out that Simat represents about the same number of scientists it takes to fill a broom closet.

The newspaper’s approach does a disservice to its readers by suggesting that there is real debate in the scientific community over intelligent design. There isn’t.

Technorati tags: , , , ,

 
0
November 26, 2005 in Media, Media Orchard by sbaradell@ideagrove.com
Judgment-Free Journalism, Continued: The Case of Prussian Blue


Teen People came close to publishing a story on the white-supremacist singing duo Prussian Blue that did not mention the words “hate,” “supremacist” or “Nazi.” The writer had agreed with the teen duo’s mother not to use these terms, but instead the more palatable “white pride.”

Sounds like the story was going to be pretty similar to this interview with the girls that appeared on the Web site of National Vanguard, a white-separatist group that includes the girls’ mom as a member.

The Teen People story was pulled after a protest at Time Warner headquarters earlier this week by citizens who saw a teaser for the article on the magazine’s Web site.

And you thought my “Anderson Cooper Interviews Hermann Goering” post was an exaggeration?

When the media begins covering Nazis in the same “he said, she said” way it now covers the “scientific” debate over intelligent design, we’re in big trouble.

(Image from NationalVanguard.org)

Technorati tags: , , ,

 
0
November 26, 2005 in Media Orchard by sbaradell@ideagrove.com
Corporate Videos Can Be Worth Every Penny

A while back, Steve Crescenzo asked this question on his blog: “Is corporate video a waste of money?”

I have a sneaking suspicion that many of the people who do corporate video do it because it’s fun. Because it’s so different than uploading copy to the intranet or producing a print publication. But that if you held a gun to their head, they’d admit that, while the corporate video is fun to do, it’s probably not worth the money it costs to do it.

Galloping to video’s defense came my old friend Dave Gardner of Visions West Productions, who responded that the format is better than prose for –

1. Inspiring and motivating. A well-crafted video is just like a feature film. The messenger controls the pacing and mood. Artful combination of music, voice and image can elicit an emotional response in an audience. Rarely do hearts race or hands clap after reading a memo. Through video, employees, investors, the public or other audiences can really catch the excitement of an executive’s or company’s vision or product.

2. Establishing credibility. Employees are the most skeptical audience around, and they know spin when they read it. Any company can direct a writer to pen rhetoric, even lies, and then print and distribute same. Only careful fact-checking can establish their veracity. Certainly an executive can appear on-camera in a video and deliver the same spin, but it is much more difficult to conceal a lie when your audience can look you in the eye. That’s the most common reason clients ask me to put their executives on tape for employee consumption — believability. Executives who are natural-born communicators are trusted by audiences when they can be seen and heard.

Dave, forgive me for editing you a little — after all these years, I just can’t help myself — but I’m going to add a third thing:

3. Telling a complex story. That whole “picture’s worth a thousand words” business is true.

Example:

Dave and I last worked together in 2003, when I was searching for a more (1) compelling, (2) credible and (3) accessible way to communicate Belo‘s strategy of media convergence. Convergence had become an overused buzz word in our industry, and investors’ eyes were beginning to glaze over when we told our story with the conventional PowerPoint.

Dave and I responded by writing and producing a video that won the IABC Gold Quill in 2004. Called A Day in the Life of Belo [wmv download], the eight-minute video shows how Belo’s media companies work together to make synergies happen.

A MediaPost reporter who turned up at a screening of the video wrote this review:

LIGHTS, CAMERA, ACTION – Kudos to Belo, the Dallas-based multimedia company, which showed an eight-minute video, “A Day in the Life of Belo,” during the CSFB conference. Belo’s got an interesting story to tell, how its TV, cable, newspaper and Internet properties work in connection with each other in places like Dallas and the Pacific Northwest. The video was pretty powerful, even if it would make newspaper traditionalists go into shock. The overnight news-gathering functions in Dallas, for instance, are handled by one central desk serving the newspaper, TV station, Internet and cable news channel. Say what you will, but it’s a smart way of using resources in a — how shall we say it — truly media agnostic way.

A well-conceived video can achieve things that other corporate communications vehicles simply cannot.

Dave also points out that video needn’t be pricey or time-consuming today:

Effective video still requires the hand of an experienced pro, but no longer is it a necessity in every case to schedule a large crew, dubbing and editing facilities weeks or months in advance. Today I can make a quick revision to a video and burn a new DVD for a client between morning coffee and breakfast. I’m actually taping a CEO at the O’Hare Admirals Club tomorrow during a stopover. I’ll edit and author the DVD when I get back to my office on Friday (a day delay because I have a shoot in Boston Thursday), and employees across North America will have access to his message on the Intranet next Monday and have DVDs on Tuesday.

If you’re considering a corporate video, here are some useful tips from Marie-Claire Ross.

Oh, and for grins: Here’s a fun corporate video from a Dutch company called MindShare, sung to the tune of Donna Summer’s “She Works Hard for the Money.” Some have trashed it as the “worst corporate video ever,” but I think it works. I can guarantee the audience loved it.

Technorati tags: , , , , , ,

 
1
November 26, 2005 in Media Orchard, Public Relations, SEO, Web Design by sbaradell@ideagrove.com
Ranking the Top PR Agency Web Sites

SiteScore is a free tool by U.K.-based Silktide that rates “how well-designed, popular and accessible your website is.” So far, SiteScore has graded more than 72,000 Web sites on a scale of 1 to 10.

Top-ranked sites include HaloScan and The Register, with scores of 9.6. The rankings vary widely and sometimes inexplicably: MSN rates a 9.2, but CNN.com rates a 2.5, for example.

Among its idiosyncracies, SiteScore penalizes sites heavily for failing to meet the W3C Web Content Accessibility Guidelines, which are geared to make Web content more accessible to people with disabilities.

We wondered which top PR agency maintained the best site — so we took the eight largest firms (by U.S. revenues) and ran them through SiteScore. Click the scores to see a detailed explanation of each agency’s results.

Here’s how they ranked:

1. Edelman … 8.4

2. Porter Novelli … 8.0

3. Hill and Knowlton … 7.9

4. Ketchum … 7.5

5. Ogilvy Public Relations Worldwide … 7.4

6. Weber Shandwick Worldwide … 7.2

7. Burson-Marsteller … 6.9

8. Fleishman-Hillard … 6.8

Congratulations, Richard and Phil.

The Idea Grove, by the way, scored a middling 7.5, tying Ketchum.

Technorati tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

 
1