<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Fox News Channel Throughout American History</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2005/10/the-fox-news-channel-throughout-american-history.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2005/10/the-fox-news-channel-throughout-american-history.html</link>
	<description>The Idea Grove is a full-service agency specializing in public relations, marketing and Web design.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:07:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SB</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2005/10/the-fox-news-channel-throughout-american-history.html/comment-page-1#comment-282</link>
		<dc:creator>SB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 01:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=273#comment-282</guid>
		<description>I have been accused elsewhere on this blog of being a hypocrite on this post, since I obviously have &quot;political leanings.&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The definition of &quot;nonpartisan&quot; is: &quot;Based on, influenced by, affiliated with, or supporting the interests or policies of no single political party.&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;By this definition, this blog and I are both nonpartisan. Nevertheless, I should not have used the phrase &quot;as nonpartisan as possible,&quot; because it suggests I try to be neutral, which is not the case.  Or, if I have tried to be neutral, I&#039;ve done a poor job of it.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I have political opinions, and I express them on this blog. I know that, over time, my opinions do add up to &quot;leanings.&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;What I should have said is this: Media Orchard attempts to avoid the simplistic political labeling of this blog. My ideas (like most people&#039;s) have more shades than that.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I have opinions, I&#039;m honest about them, but I like discussing ideas with people of all stripes.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I&#039;m not an ideologue; I listen and change my mind on things all the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been accused elsewhere on this blog of being a hypocrite on this post, since I obviously have &#8220;political leanings.&#8221;</p>
<p>The definition of &#8220;nonpartisan&#8221; is: &#8220;Based on, influenced by, affiliated with, or supporting the interests or policies of no single political party.&#8221;</p>
<p>By this definition, this blog and I are both nonpartisan. Nevertheless, I should not have used the phrase &#8220;as nonpartisan as possible,&#8221; because it suggests I try to be neutral, which is not the case.  Or, if I have tried to be neutral, I&#8217;ve done a poor job of it.</p>
<p>I have political opinions, and I express them on this blog. I know that, over time, my opinions do add up to &#8220;leanings.&#8221;</p>
<p>What I should have said is this: Media Orchard attempts to avoid the simplistic political labeling of this blog. My ideas (like most people&#8217;s) have more shades than that.</p>
<p>I have opinions, I&#8217;m honest about them, but I like discussing ideas with people of all stripes.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not an ideologue; I listen and change my mind on things all the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

