<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Soon on Pay Per View: Pepper vs. Rubel!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2005/10/soon-on-pay-per-view-pepper-vs-rubel.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2005/10/soon-on-pay-per-view-pepper-vs-rubel.html</link>
	<description>Bringing You Media News, Marketing Views, Celebrity Culture &#38; Political Spin Since February 2005</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Why Anyone Who&#8217;s Been Blogging as Long as I Have Should Want to Kill Themselves &#171; Dallas Public Relations Expert Scott Baradell&#8217;s Media Orchard</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2005/10/soon-on-pay-per-view-pepper-vs-rubel.html/comment-page-1#comment-3917</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Anyone Who&#8217;s Been Blogging as Long as I Have Should Want to Kill Themselves &#171; Dallas Public Relations Expert Scott Baradell&#8217;s Media Orchard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 21:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=226#comment-3917</guid>
		<description>[...] So we get Steve saying too many bloggers are writing lazy, boring shit, which they are, and then we have Steve promising to try to do better, which in all probability he simply won&#8217;t have time to do, and then we have a bunch of commenters who might as well have written their posts in 2005. Commenters bitching that Steve is ignoring them; commenters kissing Steve&#8217;s ass in hopes of some future link love; and even Jeremy Pepper, who still hasn&#8217;t tired of his little snipes at Steve after all these friggin&#8217; years. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So we get Steve saying too many bloggers are writing lazy, boring shit, which they are, and then we have Steve promising to try to do better, which in all probability he simply won&#8217;t have time to do, and then we have a bunch of commenters who might as well have written their posts in 2005. Commenters bitching that Steve is ignoring them; commenters kissing Steve&#8217;s ass in hopes of some future link love; and even Jeremy Pepper, who still hasn&#8217;t tired of his little snipes at Steve after all these friggin&#8217; years. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SB</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2005/10/soon-on-pay-per-view-pepper-vs-rubel.html/comment-page-1#comment-202</link>
		<dc:creator>SB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2005 15:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=226#comment-202</guid>
		<description>Jeremy: Forgot about your jet-setting schedule.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Thanks for pointing out the Jarvis post. I like his blog, but I think that post is naive BS of the Russell Beattie variety. I'm going to have to do a post on that later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremy: Forgot about your jet-setting schedule.</p>
<p>Thanks for pointing out the Jarvis post. I like his blog, but I think that post is naive BS of the Russell Beattie variety. I&#8217;m going to have to do a post on that later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2005/10/soon-on-pay-per-view-pepper-vs-rubel.html/comment-page-1#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2005 05:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=226#comment-198</guid>
		<description>Hey, I was in NY for BlogON, and then had to do my panel - &lt;a HREF="http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/10/17/who-profits/" REL="nofollow"&gt;the one Jarvis was waiting for with bated breath&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The Thrilla in Vanilla, huh? After meeting Rubel at the show, I'm pretty sure it wouldn't be much of a contest. And, sorry, no one got the photo of the tepid handshake.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;But, while the post may seem a little harsh, for someone at a small boutique to attack a woman who is a high-up VP running a large account at one of the larger agencies with a  feeble and pathetic attempt at humor is crap. He should have apologized. Leader my ass - leaders don't act that way, just jesters who want to be leaders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I was in NY for BlogON, and then had to do my panel - <a HREF="http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/10/17/who-profits/" REL="nofollow">the one Jarvis was waiting for with bated breath</a>.</p>
<p>The Thrilla in Vanilla, huh? After meeting Rubel at the show, I&#8217;m pretty sure it wouldn&#8217;t be much of a contest. And, sorry, no one got the photo of the tepid handshake.</p>
<p>But, while the post may seem a little harsh, for someone at a small boutique to attack a woman who is a high-up VP running a large account at one of the larger agencies with a  feeble and pathetic attempt at humor is crap. He should have apologized. Leader my ass - leaders don&#8217;t act that way, just jesters who want to be leaders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SB</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2005/10/soon-on-pay-per-view-pepper-vs-rubel.html/comment-page-1#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator>SB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2005 21:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=226#comment-197</guid>
		<description>Phil: I'll look into whether Tina Turner is available to referee.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Usher: Thanks for your comment; it inspired a new post as you've seen.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Jeremy: Are you out there?? I was sure I was setting you up for a classic riposte.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil: I&#8217;ll look into whether Tina Turner is available to referee.</p>
<p>Usher: Thanks for your comment; it inspired a new post as you&#8217;ve seen.</p>
<p>Jeremy: Are you out there?? I was sure I was setting you up for a classic riposte.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Usher Lieberman</title>
		<link>http://www.ideagrove.com/blog/2005/10/soon-on-pay-per-view-pepper-vs-rubel.html/comment-page-1#comment-189</link>
		<dc:creator>Usher Lieberman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2005 05:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideagrove.com/weblog/?p=226#comment-189</guid>
		<description>Let's not confuse leading with loudest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s not confuse leading with loudest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
